Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/b625f947-74e8-4824-ba9f-3c56bfa743a3/

HNNA

Hennessy Ad
Chart
$9.78
Latest Week 2026-06-05
Snapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
0.88
OS Score
92.0%
Value
88.0%
Quality
20.0%
Momentum
#47.00000000
TV Rank
7/9
F-Score
0.900
QV
Strategy Eligibility
11 of 23 passing
OS Composite
OS 0.880
Trending Value
#47.00000000
Quality × Value
QV 0.900
🏛
Cornerstone Value
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
💎
Deep Value
P/E 9.3
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 5.00000000
📐
EBITDA/EV
26.3%
Veiled Value
Piotroski Bargains
F7
🔬
Quality Compounders
📈
Consistent Earners
Noneyr
🌱
GARP
🔄
Shareholder Yield
5.5%
💰
High Yield
Div 5.5%
🚀
Momentum Leaders
Market Leaders
Tiny Titans
🔍
Small Cap Value
Val 92th
🛡
Low Volatility
🏷
Sector Cheapest
🧠
Capital Allocators
Risk-Adj Momentum
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
92.0%ile
P/E
9.3×
P/S
2.4×
P/B
0.8×
E/P
0.1071
FCF Yield
0.245
EBITDA/EV
0.263
SH Yield
0.055
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
8.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
5.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
5.00000000
/100
P/E of 9.3x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 24.5% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 5.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
88.0%ile
ROE
0.084
ROA
0.052
Net Margin
0.254
Op Margin
0.354
GPA
0.158
D/E
0.61
Current
1.78
F-Score
7/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
-0.071
Earn Growth
-0.142
Stability
0.146
lower=better
Accruals
-0.015
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
20.0%ile
6M Return
0.7%
12M Return
-6.0%
12-1 Mom
-2.8%
Risk-Adj
-0.11
Vol 252d
26.1%
Vol 60d
47.0%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-26.7%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (47%) is expanding vs long-term (26%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.88
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
Sector Context
Financial Services · 500 peers
Sector Value %ile
82.4%
Sector Quality %ile
83.0%
P/E z-score
-0.23
P/B z-score
-0.08
Sector Avg OS
86.5%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
BAP Credicorp Ltd 99.0% 98.0% 93.0% 84.0%
UVE Universal Insurance Holdings Inc 99.0% 96.0% 94.0% 82.0%
BFH Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. 99.0% 97.0% 97.0% 90.0%
MCY Mercury General Corporation 99.0% 95.0% 93.0% 86.0%
HG Hamilton Insurance Group, Ltd. 99.0% 97.0% 94.0% 85.0%
CARE Carter Bank and Trust 99.0% 96.0% 98.0% 88.0%
FXNC First National Corp 98.0% 90.0% 92.0% 84.0%
DCOM Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. 98.0% 93.0% 87.0% 83.0%
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (92th) and quality (88th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Falling Knife
Weak momentum (20th) despite looking cheap (92th value). Wait for momentum to stabilise.
Strong Capital Return
Shareholder yield 5.5% backed by 24.5% FCF yield. Returns are well-funded.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (47%) significantly exceeds 252-day (26%). Near-term risk is elevated.
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
88.1% avg (7 factors)
Quality
B
60.5% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
F
29.2% avg (4 factors)
Risk
B
73.2% avg (1 factors)
This stock sits in the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot — cheap AND high quality. Historically, this combination has generated the strongest long-term returns. Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.880—1
Value %ile0.920—1
Quality %ile0.880—1
Momentum %ile0.200—1
F-Score7.000—1
Confidence1.000—1
Volatility0.261—0
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
9.34
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.1071
Price / Sales
2.37
Price / Book
0.78
Price / Cash Flow
7.26
FCF Yield
24.5%
EBITDA / EV
26.3%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.7243
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
5.5%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
8.4%
Return on Assets
5.2%
Net Margin
25.4%
Operating Margin
35.4%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
15.8%
Debt / Equity
0.61
Current Ratio
1.78
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.015
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
0.7%
12M Return
-6.0%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-2.8%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-0.11
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-7.1%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-14.2%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.146
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
7
Dividend Yield
5.5%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
8
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
5
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
5
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
47
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity