Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/b83519c7-03bd-42a3-acd8-d30f2492c3fa/

CPF

Central Pacific Financial Corp
Chart
$35.19
Latest Week 2026-06-05
Snapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
0.97
OS Score
88.0%
Value
94.0%
Quality
79.0%
Momentum
8/9
F-Score
0.910
QV
Strategy Eligibility
12 of 23 passing
OS Composite
OS 0.970
Trending Value
Quality × Value
QV 0.910
🏛
Cornerstone Value
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
💎
Deep Value
P/E 11.6
VC2 Cheapest
📐
EBITDA/EV
17.8%
Veiled Value
Piotroski Bargains
F8
🔬
Quality Compounders
📈
Consistent Earners
Noneyr
🌱
GARP
🔄
Shareholder Yield
3.2%
💰
High Yield
Div 3.2%
🚀
Momentum Leaders
12-1 34%
Market Leaders
Tiny Titans
🔍
Small Cap Value
Val 88th
🛡
Low Volatility
Vol 25%
🏷
Sector Cheapest
🧠
Capital Allocators
Risk-Adj Momentum
RAM 1.38
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
88.0%ile
P/E
11.6×
P/S
2.6×
P/B
1.6×
E/P
0.0865
FCF Yield
0.165
EBITDA/EV
0.178
SH Yield
0.032
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
18.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
15.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
15.00000000
/100
P/E of 11.6x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 16.5% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
94.0%ile
ROE
0.135
ROA
0.011
Net Margin
0.222
Op Margin
0.290
GPA
0.038
D/E
11.62
Current
0.14
F-Score
8/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.057
Earn Growth
0.382
Stability
0.217
lower=better
Accruals
-0.002
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
Highly leveraged with D/E of 11.62 — returns are being amplified by debt. F-Score of 8/9 indicates strong fundamental improvement across multiple dimensions.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
79.0%ile
6M Return
17.1%
12M Return
36.4%
12-1 Mom
33.8%
Risk-Adj
1.38
Vol 252d
24.5%
Vol 60d
47.2%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-11.7%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of 34% is very strong — a clear uptrend. Near-term vol (47%) is expanding vs long-term (25%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.97
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
Sector Context
Financial Services · 500 peers
Sector Value %ile
70.7%
Sector Quality %ile
96.0%
P/E z-score
-0.12
P/B z-score
-0.05
Sector Avg OS
86.5%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
MCY Mercury General Corporation 99.0% 95.0% 93.0% 86.0%
BAP Credicorp Ltd 99.0% 98.0% 93.0% 84.0%
CARE Carter Bank and Trust 99.0% 96.0% 98.0% 88.0%
BFH Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. 99.0% 97.0% 97.0% 90.0%
UVE Universal Insurance Holdings Inc 99.0% 96.0% 94.0% 82.0%
HG Hamilton Insurance Group, Ltd. 99.0% 97.0% 94.0% 85.0%
DCOM Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. 98.0% 93.0% 87.0% 83.0%
VBNK VersaBank 98.0% 94.0% 85.0% 91.0%
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (88th) and quality (94th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Trending Value Signal
Cheap (88th value) with strong momentum (79th). The market is starting to recognise the value.
Piotroski + Value Convergence
F-Score 8/9 with good value (88th). Strong fundamental improvement in a cheap stock.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (47%) significantly exceeds 252-day (25%). Near-term risk is elevated.
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
78.4% avg (7 factors)
Quality
D
37.5% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
B
67.6% avg (4 factors)
Risk
A
75.8% avg (1 factors)
Deep value territory, but quality is concerning. This is either a turnaround opportunity or a value trap — the F-Score and accruals ratio will be key differentiators.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.970—1
Value %ile0.880—1
Quality %ile0.940—1
Momentum %ile0.790—1
F-Score8.000—1
Confidence1.000—1
Volatility0.245—0
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
11.55
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0865
Price / Sales
2.56
Price / Book
1.57
Price / Cash Flow
9.75
FCF Yield
16.5%
EBITDA / EV
17.8%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.5808
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
3.2%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
13.5%
Return on Assets
1.1%
Net Margin
22.2%
Operating Margin
29.0%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
3.8%
Debt / Equity
11.62
Current Ratio
0.14
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.002
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
17.1%
12M Return
36.4%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
33.8%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
1.38
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
5.7%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
38.2%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.217
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
8
Dividend Yield
3.2%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
18
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
15
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
15
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity