Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/b83519c7-03bd-42a3-acd8-d30f2492c3fa/

CPF

Central Pacific Financial Corp
Chart
38.29 USD
Latest Week 2026-07-10
Snapshot 2026-07-12 · 0.9w · Fresh
0.96
OS Score
89.0%
Value
88.0%
Quality
73.0%
Momentum
8/9
F-Score
0.885
QV
Strategy Eligibility
12 of 23 passing
OS Composite
OS 0.960
Trending Value
Quality × Value
QV 0.885
🏛
Cornerstone Value
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
💎
Deep Value
P/E 12.4
VC2 Cheapest
📐
EBITDA/EV
16.3%
Veiled Value
Piotroski Bargains
F8
🔬
Quality Compounders
📈
Consistent Earners
Yes
🌱
GARP
🔄
Shareholder Yield
6.1%
💰
High Yield
🚀
Momentum Leaders
12-1 31%
Market Leaders
Tiny Titans
🔍
Small Cap Value
Val 89%
🛡
Low Volatility
Vol 24%
🏷
Sector Cheapest
🧠
Capital Allocators
CAQ 0.89
Risk-Adj Momentum
RAM 1.31
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
89.0%ile
P/E
12.4×
P/S
2.8×
P/B
1.7×
E/P
0.1513
FCF Yield
0.145
EBITDA/EV
0.163
SH Yield
0.061
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
21.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
17.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
16.00000000
/100
FCF yield of 14.5% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
88.0%ile
ROE
0.135
ROA
0.011
Net Margin
0.222
Op Margin
0.290
GPA
0.038
D/E
11.62
Current
0.14
F-Score
8/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.057
Earn Growth
0.382
Stability
0.217
lower=better
Accruals
-0.002
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
Highly leveraged with D/E of 11.62 — returns are being amplified by debt. F-Score of 8/9 indicates strong fundamental improvement across multiple dimensions.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
73.0%ile
6M Return
22.0%
12M Return
37.0%
12-1 Mom
30.9%
Risk-Adj
1.31
Vol 252d
23.6%
Vol 60d
46.5%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-10.8%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of 31% is very strong — a clear uptrend. Near-term vol (46%) is expanding vs long-term (24%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.96
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
Sector Context
Financial Services · 500 peers
Sector Value %ile
71.3%
Sector Quality %ile
84.8%
P/E z-score
-0.15
P/B z-score
-0.04
Sector Avg OS
85.7%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
RILY BRC Group Holdings, Inc. 99.0% 95.0% 88.0% 92.0%
BFH Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. 99.0% 97.0% 89.0% 81.0%
BAP Credicorp Ltd 99.0% 97.0% 96.0% 86.0%
CARE Carter Bank and Trust 99.0% 96.0% 95.0% 92.0%
RILYL BRC Group Holdings, Inc. 99.0% 95.0% 87.0% 97.0%
IX Orix Corp Ads 98.0% 98.0% 82.0% 85.0%
FXNC First National Corp 98.0% 93.0% 85.0% 87.0%
VINP Vinci Partners Investments Ltd 98.0% 98.0% 91.0% 70.0%
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (89th) and quality (88th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Trending Value Signal
Cheap (89th value) with strong momentum (73th). The market is starting to recognise the value.
Piotroski + Value Convergence
F-Score 8/9 with good value (89th). Strong fundamental improvement in a cheap stock.
Strong Capital Return
Shareholder yield 6.1% backed by 14.5% FCF yield. Returns are well-funded.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (46%) significantly exceeds 252-day (24%). Near-term risk is elevated.
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
87.4% avg (7 factors)
Quality
D
37.5% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
B
67.9% avg (4 factors)
Risk
A
77.3% avg (1 factors)
Deep value territory, but quality is concerning. This is either a turnaround opportunity or a value trap — the F-Score and accruals ratio will be key differentiators.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends6 snapshots
Factor Persistence6 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.960—6
Value %ile0.890—6
Quality %ile0.880—6
Momentum %ile0.730—6
F-Score8.000—6
Confidence0.980—6
Volatility0.236—0
Value Lens2021-07-13 → 2026-07-12
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
12.42
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.1513
Price / Sales
2.76
Price / Book
1.68
Price / Cash Flow
10.48
FCF Yield
14.5%
EBITDA / EV
16.3%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.5224
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
6.1%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
13.5%
Return on Assets
1.1%
Net Margin
22.2%
Operating Margin
29.0%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
3.8%
Debt / Equity
11.62
Current Ratio
0.14
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.002
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
22.0%
12M Return
37.0%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
30.9%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
1.31
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
5.7%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
38.2%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.217
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
8
Dividend Yield
3.0%
Buyback Yield
3.2%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
21
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
17
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
16
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity