Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/bc4ed69c-1f8f-44b3-b41f-9d2269af436a/

CCLD

CareCloud, Inc.
Chart
$2.35
Latest Week 2026-06-05
Snapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
0.89
OS Score
91.0%
Value
89.0%
Quality
28.0%
Momentum
#84.00000000
TV Rank
5/9
F-Score
0.900
QV
Strategy Eligibility
10 of 23 passing
OS Composite
OS 0.890
Trending Value
Quality × Value
QV 0.900
🏛
Cornerstone Value
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
P/S 0.8
💎
Deep Value
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 4.00000000
📐
EBITDA/EV
28.8%
Veiled Value
Piotroski Bargains
🔬
Quality Compounders
📈
Consistent Earners
Noneyr
🌱
GARP
Rev +10%
🔄
Shareholder Yield
9.8%
💰
High Yield
Div 9.8%
🚀
Momentum Leaders
Market Leaders
Tiny Titans
🔍
Small Cap Value
Val 91th
🛡
Low Volatility
🏷
Sector Cheapest
🧠
Capital Allocators
Risk-Adj Momentum
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
91.0%ile
P/E
10.2×
P/S
0.8×
P/B
1.7×
E/P
0.0979
FCF Yield
0.327
EBITDA/EV
0.288
SH Yield
0.098
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
6.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
4.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
4.00000000
/100
P/E of 10.2x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 32.7% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 4.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
89.0%ile
ROE
0.168
ROA
0.113
Net Margin
0.079
Op Margin
0.085
GPA
0.453
D/E
0.49
Current
1.11
F-Score
5/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.103
Earn Growth
-0.027
Stability
0.345
lower=better
Accruals
-0.199
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
Conservative balance sheet with D/E of 0.49.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
28.0%ile
6M Return
-24.4%
12M Return
7.8%
12-1 Mom
8.3%
Risk-Adj
0.12
Vol 252d
71.2%
Vol 60d
134.1%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-45.1%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (134%) is expanding vs long-term (71%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.89
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
Sector Context
Healthcare · 500 peers
Sector Value %ile
96.2%
Sector Quality %ile
90.6%
P/E z-score
-0.28
P/B z-score
-0.27
Sector Avg OS
63.2%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
IRWD Ironwood Pharmaceuticals Inc 99.0% 93.0% 86.0% 98.0%
RIGL Rigel Pharmaceuticals Inc 98.0% 94.0% 92.0% 76.0%
FBIO Fortress Biotech Inc 98.0% 97.0% 93.0% 74.0%
WW WW International, Inc. Common Stock 97.0% 88.0% 80.0% 99.0%
FBIOP Fortress Biotech Inc Pref Series A 97.0% 81.0% 95.0% 90.0%
CGEN Compugen 97.0% 90.0% 95.0% 76.0%
PBYI Puma Biotechnology Inc 97.0% 80.0% 97.0% 92.0%
MD Mednax Inc 96.0% 87.0% 80.0% 87.0%
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (91th) and quality (89th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Strong Capital Return
Shareholder yield 9.8% backed by 32.7% FCF yield. Returns are well-funded.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (134%) significantly exceeds 252-day (71%). Near-term risk is elevated.
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
90.6% avg (7 factors)
Quality
B
61.1% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
D
30.3% avg (4 factors)
Risk
F
0.0% avg (1 factors)
This stock sits in the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot — cheap AND high quality. Historically, this combination has generated the strongest long-term returns. Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.890—1
Value %ile0.910—1
Quality %ile0.890—1
Momentum %ile0.280—1
F-Score5.000—0
Confidence1.000—1
Volatility0.712—1
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
10.21
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0979
Price / Sales
0.80
Price / Book
1.71
Price / Cash Flow
3.69
FCF Yield
32.7%
EBITDA / EV
28.8%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
1.2628
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
9.8%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
16.8%
Return on Assets
11.3%
Net Margin
7.9%
Operating Margin
8.5%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
45.3%
Debt / Equity
0.49
Current Ratio
1.11
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.199
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-24.4%
12M Return
7.8%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
8.3%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
0.12
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
10.3%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-2.7%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.345
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
5
Dividend Yield
9.8%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
6
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
4
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
4
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
84
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity