Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/d9c7c1e0-e4f9-47f0-8c88-61280ac6c111/
JAICORPLTD
Jai Corp LimitedSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
2 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
10.3%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
7.7%
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
71.0%ile
P/E
11.5×
P/S
3.7×
P/B
1.4×
E/P
0.0866
FCF Yield
0.021
EBITDA/EV
0.103
SH Yield
0.077
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
31.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
20.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
21.00000000
/100
P/E of 11.5x places this firmly in deep value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
18.0%ile
ROE
0.118
ROA
0.113
Net Margin
0.325
Op Margin
0.071
GPA
0.083
Current
35.04
F-Score
5/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.118
Earn Growth
0.288
Stability
1.034
lower=better
Accruals
0.084
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
Accruals ratio of 0.084 is elevated — earnings quality may be lower than headline numbers suggest.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
74.0%ile
6M Return
-13.1%
12M Return
0.6%
12-1 Mom
6.6%
Risk-Adj
0.12
Vol 252d
54.5%
Vol 60d
85.6%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-42.6%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (86%) is expanding vs long-term (54%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.73
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Basic Materials
· 368 peers
Sector Value %ile
63.4%
Sector Quality %ile
19.5%
P/E z-score
-0.17
P/B z-score
-0.45
Sector Avg OS
54.2%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
| Symbol | Name | OS | Value | Quality | Momentum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAIL | 99.0% | 93.0% | 85.0% | 92.0% | |
| ARIES | 99.0% | 97.0% | 96.0% | 77.0% | |
| GULPOLY | 99.0% | 96.0% | 94.0% | 75.0% | |
| JAYNECOIND | 99.0% | 84.0% | 98.0% | 98.0% | |
| TATASTEEL | 98.0% | 81.0% | 91.0% | 89.0% | |
| MANAKSTEEL | 98.0% | 96.0% | 72.0% | 78.0% | |
| NATIONALUM | 98.0% | 80.0% | 97.0% | 98.0% | |
| SANDUMA | 98.0% | 82.0% | 98.0% | 93.0% |
Factor Interactions
Trending Value Signal
Cheap (71th value) with strong momentum (74th). The market is starting to recognise the value.
Cheap for a Reason?
Looks cheap (71th value) but weak quality (18th). Classic value trap risk.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (86%) significantly exceeds 252-day (54%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
B
69.4% avg (7 factors)
Quality
C
52.6% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
D
31.3% avg (4 factors)
Risk
F
25.9% avg (1 factors)
Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.730 | —1 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.710 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.180 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.740 | —1 | — | |
| F-Score | 5.000 | —0 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.839 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.545 | —1 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
11.55
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0866
Price / Sales
3.75
Price / Book
1.36
Price / Cash Flow
44.09
FCF Yield
2.1%
EBITDA / EV
10.3%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.2668
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
7.7%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
11.8%
Return on Assets
11.3%
Net Margin
32.5%
Operating Margin
7.1%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
8.3%
Current Ratio
35.04
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.084
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-13.1%
12M Return
0.6%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
6.6%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
0.12
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
11.8%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
28.8%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
1.034
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
5
Dividend Yield
0.4%
Buyback Yield
7.3%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
31
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
20
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
21
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity