Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/dea84810-8fd1-4cf6-adcd-94704643bdfe/

NAMM

Namib Minerals Ordinary Shares
Chart
1.43 USD
Latest Week 2026-07-17
Snapshot 2026-07-19 · 0.6w · Fresh
0.6
OS Score
96.0%
Value
22.0%
Quality
0.0%
Momentum
4/9
F-Score
0.460
QV
Strategy Eligibility
2 of 23 passing
OS Composite
Trending Value
Quality × Value
🏛
Cornerstone Value
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
💎
Deep Value
VC2 Cheapest
📐
EBITDA/EV
145.0%
Veiled Value
Piotroski Bargains
🔬
Quality Compounders
📈
Consistent Earners
🌱
GARP
🔄
Shareholder Yield
💰
High Yield
🚀
Momentum Leaders
Market Leaders
Tiny Titans
Yes
🔍
Small Cap Value
🛡
Low Volatility
🏷
Sector Cheapest
🧠
Capital Allocators
Risk-Adj Momentum
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
96.0%ile
P/E
0.8×
P/S
0.9×
E/P
1.3602
FCF Yield
0.322
EBITDA/EV
1.450
SH Yield
0.000
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
5.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
11.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
12.00000000
/100
P/E of 0.8x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 32.2% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
22.0%ile
ROE
-2.576
ROA
1.611
Net Margin
1.225
Op Margin
1.337
GPA
0.545
D/E
-2.60
Current
0.30
F-Score
4/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Stability
2.837
lower=better
Accruals
1.392
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
Conservative balance sheet with D/E of -2.60. Accruals ratio of 1.392 is elevated — earnings quality may be lower than headline numbers suggest.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
0.0%ile
6M Return
55.4%
12M Return
-83.4%
12-1 Mom
-78.5%
Risk-Adj
-0.30
Vol 252d
261.3%
Vol 60d
650.4%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-85.3%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of -78% signals a downtrend — price is moving against you. Near-term vol (650%) is expanding vs long-term (261%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.6
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
Sector Context
Basic Materials · 219 peers
Sector Value %ile
96.8%
Sector Quality %ile
30.0%
P/E z-score
-0.48
Sector Avg OS
54.1%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
NEXA Nexa Resources SA 99.0% 97.0% 83.0% 96.0%
B Barrick Mining Corporation 99.0% 90.0% 98.0% 91.0%
CGAU Centerra Gold Inc 99.0% 96.0% 81.0% 95.0%
CPAC Cementos Pacasmayo SAA ADR 99.0% 97.0% 80.0% 94.0%
ERO Ero Copper Corp 99.0% 91.0% 96.0% 91.0%
GFI Gold Fields Ltd ADR 99.0% 93.0% 99.0% 83.0%
IAG IAMGold Corporation 99.0% 94.0% 97.0% 94.0%
BHP BHP Group Limited 98.0% 90.0% 98.0% 89.0%
Factor Interactions
Cheap for a Reason?
Looks cheap (96th value) but weak quality (22th). Classic value trap risk.
Falling Knife
Weak momentum (0th) despite looking cheap (96th value). Wait for momentum to stabilise.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (650%) significantly exceeds 252-day (261%). Near-term risk is elevated.
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
84.5% avg (6 factors)
Quality
B
62.5% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
F
29.4% avg (4 factors)
Risk
F
0.0% avg (1 factors)
This stock sits in the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot — cheap AND high quality. Historically, this combination has generated the strongest long-term returns. Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends7 snapshots
Factor Persistence7 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.600—0
Value %ile0.960—7
Quality %ile0.220—7
Momentum %ile0.000—7
F-Score4.000—7
Confidence0.822—7
Volatility2.613—7
Value Lens2021-07-20 → 2026-07-19
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
0.77
Earnings Yield (E/P)
1.3602
Price / Sales
0.94
Price / Cash Flow
5.65
FCF Yield
32.2%
EBITDA / EV
145.0%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
1.0171
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
0.0%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
-257.6%
Return on Assets
161.1%
Net Margin
122.5%
Operating Margin
133.7%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
54.5%
Debt / Equity
-2.60
Current Ratio
0.30
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
1.392
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
55.4%
12M Return
-83.4%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-78.5%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-0.30
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
2.837
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
4
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
5
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
11
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
12
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity