Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/eacc0b5d-0126-4906-a138-9baeb947878a/

DSWL

Deswell Industries Inc
Chart
3.56 USD
Latest Week 2026-07-10
Snapshot 2026-07-12 · 0.9w · Fresh
0.9
OS Score
98.0%
Value
29.0%
Quality
79.0%
Momentum
#41.00000000
TV Rank
4/9
F-Score
0.533
QV
Strategy Eligibility
11 of 23 passing
OS Composite
OS 0.900
Trending Value
#41
Quality × Value
🏛
Cornerstone Value
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
P/S 0.4
💎
Deep Value
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 2
📐
EBITDA/EV
43.1%
Veiled Value
Piotroski Bargains
🔬
Quality Compounders
ROE 19%
📈
Consistent Earners
🌱
GARP
🔄
Shareholder Yield
11.2%
💰
High Yield
Div 11.2%
🚀
Momentum Leaders
12-1 17%
Market Leaders
Tiny Titans
Yes
🔍
Small Cap Value
🛡
Low Volatility
🏷
Sector Cheapest
🧠
Capital Allocators
CAQ 1.00
Risk-Adj Momentum
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
98.0%ile
P/E
2.8×
P/S
0.4×
P/B
0.5×
E/P
0.3751
FCF Yield
0.771
EBITDA/EV
0.431
SH Yield
0.112
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
2.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
2.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
2.00000000
/100
P/E of 2.8x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 77.1% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 2.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
29.0%ile
ROE
0.188
ROA
0.158
Net Margin
0.163
Op Margin
0.100
GPA
0.210
D/E
0.19
Current
5.25
F-Score
4/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.254
Earn Growth
0.291
Stability
0.375
lower=better
Accruals
-0.034
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
Conservative balance sheet with D/E of 0.19.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
79.0%ile
6M Return
3.8%
12M Return
31.6%
12-1 Mom
17.1%
Risk-Adj
0.44
Vol 252d
38.9%
Vol 60d
73.8%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-26.5%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (74%) is expanding vs long-term (39%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.9
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
Sector Context
Technology · 500 peers
Sector Value %ile
99.6%
Sector Quality %ile
18.2%
P/E z-score
-0.20
P/B z-score
-0.22
Sector Avg OS
52.8%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
ASX ASE Industrial Holding Co Ltd ADR 99.0% 98.0% 86.0% 97.0%
KARO Karooooo Ltd 99.0% 98.0% 98.0% 70.0%
TOYO TOYO Co., Ltd Ordinary Shares 99.0% 97.0% 97.0% 93.0%
VISN CommScope Holding Company, Inc. 98.0% 94.0% 74.0% 98.0%
CCSI Consensus Cloud Solutions Inc 98.0% 86.0% 98.0% 92.0%
ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson B ADR 98.0% 98.0% 77.0% 88.0%
PLAB Photronics Inc 98.0% 94.0% 85.0% 89.0%
TDC Teradata Corp 97.0% 88.0% 96.0% 79.0%
Factor Interactions
Trending Value Signal
Cheap (98th value) with strong momentum (79th). The market is starting to recognise the value.
Cheap for a Reason?
Looks cheap (98th value) but weak quality (29th). Classic value trap risk.
Growth at Reasonable Price
Revenue growing 25% with P/E of 3×. Growth isn't fully priced in.
Strong Capital Return
Shareholder yield 11.2% backed by 77.1% FCF yield. Returns are well-funded.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (74%) significantly exceeds 252-day (39%). Near-term risk is elevated.
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
99.8% avg (7 factors)
Quality
B
69.6% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
C
50.7% avg (4 factors)
Risk
C
51.8% avg (1 factors)
This stock sits in the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot — cheap AND high quality. Historically, this combination has generated the strongest long-term returns.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends6 snapshots
Factor Persistence6 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.900—6
Value %ile0.980—6
Quality %ile0.290—6
Momentum %ile0.790—6
F-Score4.000—6
Confidence0.951—6
Volatility0.389—0
Value Lens2021-07-13 → 2026-07-12
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
2.75
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.3751
Price / Sales
0.45
Price / Book
0.52
Price / Cash Flow
2.27
FCF Yield
77.1%
EBITDA / EV
43.1%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
3.7684
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
11.2%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
18.8%
Return on Assets
15.8%
Net Margin
16.3%
Operating Margin
10.0%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
21.0%
Debt / Equity
0.19
Current Ratio
5.25
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.034
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
3.8%
12M Return
31.6%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
17.1%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
0.44
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
25.4%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
29.1%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.375
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
4
Dividend Yield
11.2%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
2
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
2
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
2
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
41
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity