Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/f63fd3c2-098e-493e-bb35-c736f3ec80f2/

CVE

Cenovus Energy Inc
Chart
$28.22
Latest Week 2026-06-05
Snapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
0.98
OS Score
92.0%
Value
80.0%
Quality
94.0%
Momentum
#4.00000000
TV Rank
6/9
F-Score
0.858
QV
Strategy Eligibility
9 of 23 passing
OS Composite
OS 0.980
Trending Value
#4.00000000
Quality × Value
QV 0.858
🏛
Cornerstone Value
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
💎
Deep Value
P/E 11.4
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 7.00000000
📐
EBITDA/EV
18.8%
Veiled Value
Piotroski Bargains
🔬
Quality Compounders
📈
Consistent Earners
🌱
GARP
🔄
Shareholder Yield
2.8%
💰
High Yield
🚀
Momentum Leaders
12-1 117%
Market Leaders
Tiny Titans
🔍
Small Cap Value
🛡
Low Volatility
🏷
Sector Cheapest
🧠
Capital Allocators
Risk-Adj Momentum
RAM 3.53
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
92.0%ile
P/E
11.4×
P/S
1.1×
P/B
1.6×
E/P
0.0876
FCF Yield
0.225
EBITDA/EV
0.188
SH Yield
0.028
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
9.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
7.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
7.00000000
/100
P/E of 11.4x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 22.5% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 7.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
80.0%ile
ROE
0.142
ROA
0.071
Net Margin
0.094
Op Margin
0.121
GPA
0.149
D/E
0.99
Current
1.57
F-Score
6/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
-0.164
Earn Growth
0.644
Stability
0.441
lower=better
Accruals
-0.068
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
94.0%ile
6M Return
56.4%
12M Return
115.5%
12-1 Mom
116.9%
Risk-Adj
3.53
Vol 252d
33.1%
Vol 60d
75.3%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-10.5%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of 117% is very strong — a clear uptrend. Risk-adjusted momentum of 3.53 is excellent — strong returns relative to volatility. Near-term vol (75%) is expanding vs long-term (33%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.98
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
Sector Context
Energy · 226 peers
Sector Value %ile
83.3%
Sector Quality %ile
69.6%
P/E z-score
-0.54
P/B z-score
-0.07
Sector Avg OS
71.8%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
NBR Nabors Industries Ltd. 99.0% 96.0% 95.0% 97.0%
PBR-A Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras 99.0% 96.0% 93.0% 88.0%
APA APA Corporation 99.0% 95.0% 96.0% 92.0%
PBR Petroleo Brasileiro Petrobras SA ADR 99.0% 95.0% 93.0% 89.0%
TRMD Torm PLC Class A 98.0% 94.0% 82.0% 91.0%
LPG Dorian LPG Ltd 98.0% 87.0% 91.0% 92.0%
SD SandRidge Energy Inc 98.0% 95.0% 92.0% 83.0%
IMPP Imperial Petroleum Inc 98.0% 98.0% 74.0% 88.0%
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (92th) and quality (80th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Trending Value Signal
Cheap (92th value) with strong momentum (94th). The market is starting to recognise the value.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (75%) significantly exceeds 252-day (33%). Near-term risk is elevated.
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
80.0% avg (7 factors)
Quality
C
51.1% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
A
100.0% avg (4 factors)
Risk
B
61.4% avg (1 factors)
Momentum is confirming the value — this is the Trending Value signal that O'Shaughnessy found to be among the most powerful.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.980—1
Value %ile0.920—1
Quality %ile0.800—1
Momentum %ile0.940—1
F-Score6.000—0
Confidence1.000—1
Volatility0.331—0
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
11.42
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0876
Price / Sales
1.07
Price / Book
1.63
Price / Cash Flow
5.83
FCF Yield
22.5%
EBITDA / EV
18.8%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.8038
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
2.8%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
14.2%
Return on Assets
7.1%
Net Margin
9.4%
Operating Margin
12.1%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
14.9%
Debt / Equity
0.99
Current Ratio
1.57
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.068
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
56.4%
12M Return
115.5%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
116.9%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
3.53
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-16.4%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
64.4%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.441
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
6
Dividend Yield
2.8%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
9
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
7
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
7
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
4
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity