Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/03fca7de-27cc-459c-88c1-c3ace3ef905e/
FLXS
Flexsteel Industries IncSnapshot 2026-07-12 · 0.7w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
10 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
OS 0.980
↗
Trending Value
#2
◆
Quality × Value
QV 0.850
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
P/E 9.3
◇
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 10
📐
EBITDA/EV
15.7%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
F7
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
Val 95%
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
CAQ 1.00
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
RAM 1.09
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
95.0%ile
P/E
9.3×
P/S
0.6×
P/B
1.6×
E/P
0.1447
FCF Yield
0.163
EBITDA/EV
0.157
SH Yield
0.016
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
7.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
10.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
10.00000000
/100
P/E of 9.3x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 16.3% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 10.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
76.0%ile
ROE
0.168
ROA
0.107
Net Margin
0.068
Op Margin
0.091
GPA
0.366
D/E
0.57
Current
3.44
F-Score
7/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.048
Earn Growth
1.165
Stability
0.765
lower=better
Accruals
-0.040
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
92.0%ile
6M Return
78.5%
12M Return
90.9%
12-1 Mom
68.2%
Risk-Adj
1.09
Vol 252d
62.8%
Vol 60d
139.5%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-29.8%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of 68% is very strong — a clear uptrend. Near-term vol (139%) is expanding vs long-term (63%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.98
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Consumer Cyclical
· 500 peers
Sector Value %ile
96.6%
Sector Quality %ile
80.0%
P/E z-score
-0.23
P/B z-score
-0.09
Sector Avg OS
49.8%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (95th) and quality (76th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Trending Value Signal
Cheap (95th value) with strong momentum (92th). The market is starting to recognise the value.
Hot but Volatile
Strong momentum (92th) but high volatility (63%). Momentum could reverse sharply.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (139%) significantly exceeds 252-day (63%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
82.5% avg (7 factors)
Quality
B
64.5% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
A
88.0% avg (4 factors)
Risk
F
12.1% avg (1 factors)
This stock sits in the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot — cheap AND high quality. Historically, this combination has generated the strongest long-term returns. Momentum is confirming the value — this is the Trending Value signal that O'Shaughnessy found to be among the most powerful. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends6 snapshots
Factor Persistence6 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.980 | —6 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.950 | —6 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.760 | —6 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.920 | —6 | — | |
| F-Score | 7.000 | —6 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.980 | —6 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.628 | —6 | — |
Value Lens2021-07-13 → 2026-07-12
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
9.34
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.1447
Price / Sales
0.63
Price / Book
1.57
Price / Cash Flow
6.79
FCF Yield
16.3%
EBITDA / EV
15.7%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
1.5961
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
1.6%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
16.8%
Return on Assets
10.7%
Net Margin
6.8%
Operating Margin
9.1%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
36.6%
Debt / Equity
0.57
Current Ratio
3.44
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.040
External Financing
Net issuance — lower=better
0.004
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
78.5%
12M Return
90.9%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
68.2%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
1.09
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
4.8%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
116.5%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.765
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
7
Dividend Yield
1.2%
Buyback Yield
0.4%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
7
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
10
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
10
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
2
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity