Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/23a2dc6f-3a78-4779-b971-7a007c4259d1/

MNST

Monster Beverage Corp
Chart
$89.55
Latest Week 2026-06-05
Consumer DefensiveBeverages - Non-AlcoholicLARGE
Snapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
0.39
OS Score
2.0%
Value
90.0%
Quality
80.0%
Momentum
6/9
F-Score
0.134
QV
StrategiesValueQualityMomentumCompositeInteractionsFactor AnalysisTrendsFundamentals
Strategy Eligibility
4 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
ROE 23%
📈
Consistent Earners
Noneyr
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
12-1 36%
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
RAM 1.40
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
2.0%ile
P/E
43.6×
P/S
10.1×
P/B
10.1×
E/P
0.0230
FCF Yield
0.027
EBITDA/EV
0.031
SH Yield
0.000
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
98.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
98.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
98.00000000
/100
P/E of 43.6x is premium-priced — the market is paying up for expected growth. VC2 score of 98.00000000/100 — expensive across all six composite measures.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
90.0%ile
ROE
0.233
ROA
0.187
Net Margin
0.231
Op Margin
0.296
GPA
0.450
D/E
0.24
Current
3.26
F-Score
6/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.181
Earn Growth
0.346
Stability
0.209
lower=better
Accruals
-0.015
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
ROE of 23% is exceptional. Conservative balance sheet with D/E of 0.24.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
80.0%ile
6M Return
21.4%
12M Return
41.2%
12-1 Mom
36.1%
Risk-Adj
1.40
Vol 252d
25.8%
Vol 60d
55.6%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-15.8%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of 36% is very strong — a clear uptrend. Near-term vol (56%) is expanding vs long-term (26%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.39
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Consumer Defensive · 236 peers
Sector Value %ile
1.7%
Sector Quality %ile
92.4%
P/E z-score
0.19
P/B z-score
0.08
Sector Avg OS
50.1%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
ABEV Ambev SA ADR 99.0% 98.0% 97.0% 80.0%
VFF Village Farms International Inc 98.0% 97.0% 78.0% 91.0%
SENEB Seneca Foods Corp B 97.0% 94.0% 73.0% 86.0%
HLF Herbalife Nutrition Ltd 97.0% 95.0% 72.0% 86.0%
SENEA Seneca Foods Corp A 96.0% 94.0% 74.0% 84.0%
DDL Dingdong (Cayman) Limited ADR 96.0% 99.0% 73.0% 71.0%
JBS JBS N.V. 95.0% 98.0% 72.0% 65.0%
NATR Natures Sunshine Products Inc 95.0% 81.0% 86.0% 82.0%
Factor Interactions
Quality Momentum — Expensive
Strong quality (90th) and momentum (80th) but expensive (2th value). Premium priced — watch for mean reversion.
Quality at a Premium
High quality (90th) but expensive (2th value). Upside may be limited without earnings growth.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (56%) significantly exceeds 252-day (26%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
F
17.6% avg (7 factors)
Quality
A
87.8% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
B
71.2% avg (4 factors)
Risk
B
73.7% avg (1 factors)
High quality business commanding a premium price. The market recognises the quality — returns from here depend on continued fundamental execution.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.390—0—
Value %ile0.020—1—
Quality %ile0.900—1—
Momentum %ile0.800—1—
F-Score6.000—0—
Confidence1.000—1—
Volatility0.258—0—
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
43.55
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0230
Price / Sales
10.06
Price / Book
10.14
Price / Cash Flow
40.31
FCF Yield
2.7%
EBITDA / EV
3.1%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.1017
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
0.0%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
23.3%
Return on Assets
18.7%
Net Margin
23.1%
Operating Margin
29.6%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
45.0%
Debt / Equity
0.24
Current Ratio
3.26
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.015
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
21.4%
12M Return
41.2%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
36.1%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
1.40
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
18.1%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
34.6%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.209
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
6
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
98
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
98
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
98
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity