Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/24916723-f633-4dc0-a871-05ed6b5bf5f7/
MWC
Micware Co., Ltd. American Depositary SharesSnapshot 2026-07-26 · 0.7w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
0 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
49.0%ile
P/B
0.0×
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
52.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
52.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
52.00000000
/100
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
47.0%ile
ROE
0.191
ROA
0.066
Net Margin
0.073
Op Margin
0.108
GPA
0.329
D/E
1.88
Current
1.66
F-Score
7/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.037
Earn Growth
0.204
Accruals
-0.019
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
49.0%ile
Vol 252d
162.1%
Vol 60d
162.1%
↓ Contracting
Max DD 12M
-80.4%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.5
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Consumer Cyclical
· 486 peers
Sector Value %ile
44.8%
Sector Quality %ile
55.2%
P/B z-score
-0.11
Sector Avg OS
50.4%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
100.0% avg (1 factors)
Quality
C
50.8% avg (8 factors)
Risk
F
0.0% avg (1 factors)
Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends8 snapshots
Factor Persistence8 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.500 | —0 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.490 | —0 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.470 | —0 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.490 | —0 | — | |
| F-Score | 7.000 | —8 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.717 | —8 | — | |
| Volatility | 1.621 | —2 | — |
Value Lens2021-07-27 → 2026-07-26
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
Price / Book
0.01
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
19.1%
Return on Assets
6.6%
Net Margin
7.3%
Operating Margin
10.8%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
32.9%
Debt / Equity
1.88
Current Ratio
1.66
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.019
External Financing
Net issuance — lower=better
0.006
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
3.7%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
20.4%
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
7
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
52
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
52
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
52
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity