Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/5a2be2bb-0207-409d-9808-1798a0f119a1/

ENGH

Enghouse Systems Limited
Chart
16.48 CAD
Latest Week 2026-07-10
TechnologySoftware - ApplicationSMALL
Snapshot 2026-07-12 · 0.7w · Fresh
0.8
OS Score
92.0%
Value
67.0%
Quality
7.0%
Momentum
#91.00000000
TV Rank
4/9
F-Score
0.785
QV
StrategiesValueQualityMomentumCompositeInteractionsFactor AnalysisTrendsFundamentals
Strategy Eligibility
8 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
OS 0.800
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
QV 0.785
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 9
📐
EBITDA/EV
19.8%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
Yes
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
9.1%
💰
High Yield
Div 7.3%
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
CAQ 0.86
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
92.0%ile
P/E
12.4×
P/S
1.8×
P/B
1.5×
E/P
0.1415
FCF Yield
0.153
EBITDA/EV
0.198
SH Yield
0.091
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
13.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
9.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
12.00000000
/100
FCF yield of 15.3% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 9.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
67.0%ile
ROE
0.121
ROA
0.087
Net Margin
0.149
Op Margin
0.186
GPA
0.366
Current
1.77
F-Score
4/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
-0.007
Earn Growth
-0.084
Stability
0.161
lower=better
Accruals
-0.032
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
7.0%ile
6M Return
-16.7%
12M Return
-23.5%
12-1 Mom
-25.9%
Risk-Adj
-0.87
Vol 252d
29.8%
Vol 60d
70.9%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-33.2%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of -26% signals a downtrend — price is moving against you. Near-term vol (71%) is expanding vs long-term (30%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.8
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Technology · 39 peers
Sector Value %ile
95.0%
Sector Quality %ile
57.5%
P/E z-score
-0.93
P/B z-score
-0.69
Sector Avg OS
33.1%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
GIB-A CGI Inc. 82.0% 90.0% 79.0% 5.0%
ALYA Alithya Group Inc. 80.0% 95.0% 65.0% 1.0%
CMG Computer Modelling Group Ltd. 73.0% 71.0% 97.0% 1.0%
XTRA Xtract One Technologies Inc. 71.0% 58.0% 60.0% 61.0%
ABXX Abaxx Technologies Inc. 70.0% 58.0% 59.0% 60.0%
ADCO Adcore Inc. 67.0% 57.0% 58.0% 59.0%
DBO D-BOX Technologies Inc. 65.0% 18.0% 92.0% 98.0%
BYL Baylin Technologies Inc. 64.0% 55.0% 57.0% 58.0%
Factor Interactions
Falling Knife
Weak momentum (7th) despite looking cheap (92th value). Wait for momentum to stabilise.
Strong Capital Return
Shareholder yield 9.1% backed by 15.3% FCF yield. Returns are well-funded.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (71%) significantly exceeds 252-day (30%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
93.3% avg (7 factors)
Quality
C
58.3% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
F
6.8% avg (4 factors)
Risk
B
67.0% avg (1 factors)
Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends6 snapshots
Factor Persistence6 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.800—6—
Value %ile0.920—6—
Quality %ile0.670—0—
Momentum %ile0.070—6—
F-Score4.000—6—
Confidence0.939—6—
Volatility0.298—0—
Value Lens2021-07-13 → 2026-07-12
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
12.43
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.1415
Price / Sales
1.85
Price / Book
1.50
Price / Cash Flow
9.04
FCF Yield
15.3%
EBITDA / EV
19.8%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.7625
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
9.1%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
12.1%
Return on Assets
8.7%
Net Margin
14.9%
Operating Margin
18.6%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
36.6%
Current Ratio
1.77
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.032
External Financing
Net issuance — lower=better
0.019
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-16.7%
12M Return
-23.5%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-25.9%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-0.87
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-0.7%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-8.4%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.161
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
4
Dividend Yield
7.3%
Buyback Yield
1.8%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
13
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
9
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
12
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
91
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity