Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/5abd6391-1e98-466f-b568-7875a9611f53/

KMSUGAR

K.M. Sugar Mills Limited
Chart
₹27.01
Latest Week 2026-06-05
Consumer DefensiveConfectionersMID
Snapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
0.97
OS Score
99.0%
Value
71.0%
Quality
65.0%
Momentum
#38.00000000
TV Rank
8/9
F-Score
0.838
QV
StrategiesValueQualityMomentumCompositeInteractionsFactor AnalysisTrendsFundamentals
Strategy Eligibility
9 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
OS 0.970
↗
Trending Value
#38.00000000
◆
Quality × Value
QV 0.838
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
P/S 0.4
💎
Deep Value
P/E 4.5
◇
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 4.00000000
📐
EBITDA/EV
34.8%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
F8
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
Noneyr
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
99.0%ile
P/E
4.5×
P/S
0.4×
P/B
0.7×
E/P
0.2223
FCF Yield
0.051
EBITDA/EV
0.348
SH Yield
0.000
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
2.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
4.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
5.00000000
/100
P/E of 4.5x places this firmly in deep value territory. VC2 score of 4.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
71.0%ile
ROE
0.152
ROA
0.117
Net Margin
0.079
Op Margin
0.104
GPA
0.447
Current
1.74
F-Score
8/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
-0.001
Earn Growth
0.266
Stability
0.300
lower=better
Accruals
0.051
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
F-Score of 8/9 indicates strong fundamental improvement across multiple dimensions.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
65.0%ile
6M Return
0.6%
12M Return
-10.3%
12-1 Mom
-0.4%
Risk-Adj
-0.02
Vol 252d
23.3%
Vol 60d
53.1%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-19.6%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (53%) is expanding vs long-term (23%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.97
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Consumer Defensive · 161 peers
Sector Value %ile
100.0%
Sector Quality %ile
69.1%
P/E z-score
-0.65
P/B z-score
-0.43
Sector Avg OS
51.4%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
KRBL KRBL Limited 98.0% 94.0% 84.0% 69.0%
SKMEGGPROD SKM Egg Products Export (India) Limited 98.0% 80.0% 86.0% 96.0%
UNITEDTEA The United Nilgiri Tea Estates Company Limited 97.0% 87.0% 76.0% 82.0%
GOKULAGRO Gokul Agro Resources Limited 95.0% 75.0% 75.0% 95.0%
BBTC The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Limited 94.0% 98.0% 97.0% 20.0%
GANESHCP GANESH CONSUMER PRODUCT L 94.0% 96.0% 70.0% 54.0%
BCLIND BCL Industries Limited 93.0% 98.0% 85.0% 25.0%
ZEELEARN Zee Learn Limited 92.0% 98.0% 92.0% 16.0%
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (99th) and quality (71th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Piotroski + Value Convergence
F-Score 8/9 with good value (99th). Strong fundamental improvement in a cheap stock.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (53%) significantly exceeds 252-day (23%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
79.8% avg (7 factors)
Quality
C
52.5% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
F
29.4% avg (4 factors)
Risk
A
77.8% avg (1 factors)
Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.970—1—
Value %ile0.990—1—
Quality %ile0.710—1—
Momentum %ile0.650—0—
F-Score8.000—1—
Confidence0.839—1—
Volatility0.233—0—
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
4.50
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.2223
Price / Sales
0.35
Price / Book
0.69
Price / Cash Flow
7.93
FCF Yield
5.1%
EBITDA / EV
34.8%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
2.2339
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
0.0%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
15.2%
Return on Assets
11.7%
Net Margin
7.9%
Operating Margin
10.4%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
44.7%
Current Ratio
1.74
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.051
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
0.6%
12M Return
-10.3%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-0.4%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-0.02
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-0.1%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
26.6%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.300
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
8
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
2
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
4
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
5
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
38
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity