Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/5eff9845-d5a7-4dcd-bcf7-f5d2c2c28e78/
CMTV
Community Bancorp. Common StockSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
9 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
OS 0.920
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
QV 0.753
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
P/E 12.1
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
8.1%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
Noneyr
🌱
GARP
Rev +68%
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
12-1 115%
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
Val 70th
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
RAM 2.62
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
70.0%ile
P/E
12.1×
P/S
3.1×
P/B
1.8×
E/P
0.0826
FCF Yield
0.077
EBITDA/EV
0.081
SH Yield
0.019
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
33.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
30.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
30.00000000
/100
FCF yield of 7.7% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
81.0%ile
ROE
0.152
ROA
0.014
Net Margin
0.260
Op Margin
0.313
GPA
0.038
D/E
9.57
Current
0.19
F-Score
6/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.682
Earn Growth
0.323
Stability
0.185
lower=better
Accruals
-0.002
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
Highly leveraged with D/E of 9.57 — returns are being amplified by debt.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
93.0%ile
6M Return
64.4%
12M Return
109.8%
12-1 Mom
115.4%
Risk-Adj
2.62
Vol 252d
44.0%
Vol 60d
110.5%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-20.7%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of 115% is very strong — a clear uptrend. Risk-adjusted momentum of 2.62 is excellent — strong returns relative to volatility. Near-term vol (111%) is expanding vs long-term (44%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.92
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Financial Services
· 500 peers
Sector Value %ile
23.2%
Sector Quality %ile
64.5%
P/E z-score
-0.09
P/B z-score
-0.04
Sector Avg OS
86.5%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (70th) and quality (81th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Trending Value Signal
Cheap (70th value) with strong momentum (93th). The market is starting to recognise the value.
Growth at Reasonable Price
Revenue growing 68% with P/E of 12×. Growth isn't fully priced in.
Hot but Volatile
Strong momentum (93th) but high volatility (44%). Momentum could reverse sharply.
Leveraged Returns
Strong ROE (15%) boosted by high leverage (D/E 9.6). Returns look good but come with balance sheet risk.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (111%) significantly exceeds 252-day (44%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
B
63.4% avg (7 factors)
Quality
D
39.9% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
A
97.7% avg (4 factors)
Risk
D
43.4% avg (1 factors)
Deep value territory, but quality is concerning. This is either a turnaround opportunity or a value trap — the F-Score and accruals ratio will be key differentiators. Momentum is confirming the value — this is the Trending Value signal that O'Shaughnessy found to be among the most powerful. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.920 | —1 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.700 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.810 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.930 | —1 | — | |
| F-Score | 6.000 | —0 | — | |
| Confidence | 1.000 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.440 | —1 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
12.11
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0826
Price / Sales
3.15
Price / Book
1.85
Price / Cash Flow
10.94
FCF Yield
7.7%
EBITDA / EV
8.1%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.2482
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
1.9%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
15.2%
Return on Assets
1.4%
Net Margin
26.0%
Operating Margin
31.3%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
3.8%
Debt / Equity
9.57
Current Ratio
0.19
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.002
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
64.4%
12M Return
109.8%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
115.4%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
2.62
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
68.2%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
32.3%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.185
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
6
Dividend Yield
1.9%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
33
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
30
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
30
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity