Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/8bc55b41-1487-4d6b-bb9d-7f293960e65e/

HPQ

HP Inc
Chart
27.27 USD
Latest Week 2026-07-31
Snapshot 2026-07-26 · 0.9w · Fresh
0.66
OS Score
93.0%
Value
13.0%
Quality
28.0%
Momentum
#9.00000000
TV Rank
5/9
F-Score
0.348
QV
Strategy Eligibility
7 of 23 passing
OS Composite
Trending Value
#9
Quality × Value
🏛
Cornerstone Value
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
💎
Deep Value
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 5
📐
EBITDA/EV
13.3%
Veiled Value
Piotroski Bargains
🔬
Quality Compounders
📈
Consistent Earners
Yes
🌱
GARP
🔄
Shareholder Yield
9.2%
💰
High Yield
Div 4.6%
🚀
Momentum Leaders
Market Leaders
Tiny Titans
🔍
Small Cap Value
🛡
Low Volatility
🏷
Sector Cheapest
🧠
Capital Allocators
CAQ 0.94
Risk-Adj Momentum
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
93.0%ile
P/E
9.2×
P/S
0.4×
E/P
0.1042
FCF Yield
0.183
EBITDA/EV
0.133
SH Yield
0.092
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
7.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
5.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
6.00000000
/100
P/E of 9.2x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 18.3% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 5.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
13.0%ile
ROE
-17.729
ROA
0.059
Net Margin
0.044
Op Margin
0.054
GPA
0.270
D/E
-299.17
Current
0.79
F-Score
5/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.057
Earn Growth
0.014
Stability
0.277
lower=better
Accruals
-0.048
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
Conservative balance sheet with D/E of -299.17.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
28.0%ile
6M Return
36.3%
12M Return
5.4%
12-1 Mom
-6.3%
Risk-Adj
-0.16
Vol 252d
40.0%
Vol 60d
96.0%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-35.4%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (96%) is expanding vs long-term (40%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.66
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
Sector Context
Technology · 500 peers
Sector Value %ile
94.2%
Sector Quality %ile
7.8%
P/E z-score
-0.17
Sector Avg OS
51.5%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson B ADR 99.0% 99.0% 93.0% 78.0%
ASX ASE Industrial Holding Co Ltd ADR 99.0% 98.0% 84.0% 98.0%
TOYO TOYO Co., Ltd Ordinary Shares 99.0% 97.0% 97.0% 82.0%
UMC United Microelectronics 99.0% 99.0% 80.0% 97.0%
TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing 99.0% 98.0% 98.0% 90.0%
CCSI Consensus Cloud Solutions Inc 98.0% 87.0% 98.0% 91.0%
KARO Karooooo Ltd 98.0% 98.0% 98.0% 72.0%
VISN CommScope Holding Company, Inc. 98.0% 95.0% 77.0% 98.0%
Factor Interactions
Cheap for a Reason?
Looks cheap (93th value) but weak quality (13th). Classic value trap risk.
Strong Capital Return
Shareholder yield 9.2% backed by 18.3% FCF yield. Returns are well-funded.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (96%) significantly exceeds 252-day (40%). Near-term risk is elevated.
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
87.6% avg (6 factors)
Quality
D
42.0% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
D
42.0% avg (4 factors)
Risk
C
50.0% avg (1 factors)
Deep value territory, but quality is concerning. This is either a turnaround opportunity or a value trap — the F-Score and accruals ratio will be key differentiators. Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends8 snapshots
Factor Persistence8 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.660—0
Value %ile0.930—8
Quality %ile0.130—8
Momentum %ile0.280—4
F-Score5.000—0
Confidence0.939—8
Volatility0.400—3
Value Lens2021-07-27 → 2026-07-26
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
9.22
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.1042
Price / Sales
0.41
Price / Cash Flow
5.13
FCF Yield
18.3%
EBITDA / EV
13.3%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
1.9456
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
9.2%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
-1772.9%
Return on Assets
5.9%
Net Margin
4.4%
Operating Margin
5.4%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
27.0%
Debt / Equity
-299.17
Current Ratio
0.79
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.048
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
36.3%
12M Return
5.4%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-6.3%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-0.16
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
5.7%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
1.4%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.277
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
5
Dividend Yield
4.6%
Buyback Yield
4.6%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
7
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
5
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
6
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
9
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity