Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/ac794a50-c538-4007-bb7f-26172786eb9a/

DUOL

Duolingo Inc
Chart
134.81 USD
Latest Week 2026-07-31
TechnologySoftware - ApplicationMID
Snapshot 2026-08-02 · 0.1w · Fresh
0.16
OS Score
16.0%
Value
91.0%
Quality
8.0%
Momentum
3/9
F-Score
0.382
QV
StrategiesValueQualityMomentumCompositeInteractionsFactor AnalysisTrendsFundamentals
Strategy Eligibility
2 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
ROE 30%
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
Rev +35%
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
16.0%ile
P/E
14.9×
P/S
5.7×
P/B
4.5×
E/P
0.0388
FCF Yield
0.086
EBITDA/EV
0.042
SH Yield
-0.002
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
85.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
88.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
88.00000000
/100
FCF yield of 8.6% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 88.00000000/100 — expensive across all six composite measures.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
91.0%ile
ROE
0.303
ROA
0.205
Net Margin
0.384
Op Margin
0.185
GPA
0.385
D/E
0.48
Current
2.62
F-Score
3/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.355
Earn Growth
3.366
Stability
1.426
lower=better
Accruals
-0.005
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
ROE of 30% is exceptional. Conservative balance sheet with D/E of 0.48.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
8.0%ile
6M Return
0.6%
12M Return
-60.2%
12-1 Mom
-62.9%
Risk-Adj
-1.10
Vol 252d
57.2%
Vol 60d
108.3%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-75.7%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of -63% signals a downtrend — price is moving against you. Near-term vol (108%) is expanding vs long-term (57%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.16
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Technology · 500 peers
Sector Value %ile
20.6%
Sector Quality %ile
86.4%
P/E z-score
-0.17
P/B z-score
-0.11
Sector Avg OS
52.1%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing 99.0% 98.0% 98.0% 83.0%
CCSI Consensus Cloud Solutions Inc 99.0% 88.0% 98.0% 94.0%
KARO Karooooo Ltd 99.0% 98.0% 97.0% 82.0%
VISN CommScope Holding Company, Inc. 99.0% 95.0% 77.0% 98.0%
ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson B ADR 99.0% 99.0% 93.0% 87.0%
ASX ASE Industrial Holding Co Ltd ADR 99.0% 99.0% 86.0% 91.0%
UMC United Microelectronics 99.0% 99.0% 83.0% 90.0%
PLAB Photronics Inc 98.0% 94.0% 85.0% 89.0%
Factor Interactions
Growth at Reasonable Price
Revenue growing 35% with P/E of 15×. Growth isn't fully priced in.
Quality at a Premium
High quality (91th) but expensive (16th value). Upside may be limited without earnings growth.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (108%) significantly exceeds 252-day (57%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
C
45.6% avg (7 factors)
Quality
A
83.2% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
F
9.6% avg (4 factors)
Risk
F
21.3% avg (1 factors)
Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends9 snapshots
Factor Persistence9 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.160—9—
Value %ile0.160—9—
Quality %ile0.910—9—
Momentum %ile0.080—9—
F-Score3.000—9—
Confidence0.919—9—
Volatility0.572—9—
Value Lens2021-08-03 → 2026-08-02
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
14.87
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0388
Price / Sales
5.72
Price / Book
4.51
Price / Cash Flow
14.51
FCF Yield
8.6%
EBITDA / EV
4.2%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.2099
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
-0.2%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
30.3%
Return on Assets
20.5%
Net Margin
38.4%
Operating Margin
18.5%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
38.5%
Debt / Equity
0.48
Current Ratio
2.62
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.005
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
0.6%
12M Return
-60.2%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-62.9%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-1.10
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
35.5%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
336.6%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
1.426
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
3
Buyback Yield
-0.2%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
85
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
88
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
88
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity