Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/adefcac2-b0bb-4361-aa14-587ecc0dd504/
CABP
CAB Payments Holdings LimitedSnapshot 2026-07-26 · 1.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
4 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
OS 0.820
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
QV 0.705
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
12-1 64%
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
RAM 1.51
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
70.0%ile
P/B
0.1×
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
30.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
31.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
31.00000000
/100
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
71.0%ile
ROE
0.084
ROA
0.008
Net Margin
0.115
F-Score
4/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.114
Earn Growth
-0.046
Accruals
0.381
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
Accruals ratio of 0.381 is elevated — earnings quality may be lower than headline numbers suggest.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
71.0%ile
6M Return
6.9%
12M Return
58.1%
12-1 Mom
63.7%
Risk-Adj
1.51
Vol 252d
42.2%
Vol 60d
99.1%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-16.3%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of 64% is very strong — a clear uptrend. Risk-adjusted momentum of 1.51 is excellent — strong returns relative to volatility. Near-term vol (99%) is expanding vs long-term (42%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.82
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Financial Services
· 185 peers
Sector Value %ile
61.3%
Sector Quality %ile
69.4%
P/B z-score
-0.51
Sector Avg OS
56.7%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (70th) and quality (71th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Trending Value Signal
Cheap (70th value) with strong momentum (71th). The market is starting to recognise the value.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (99%) significantly exceeds 252-day (42%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
100.0% avg (1 factors)
Quality
F
20.8% avg (4 factors)
Momentum
A
76.7% avg (4 factors)
Risk
C
46.4% avg (1 factors)
Deep value territory, but quality is concerning. This is either a turnaround opportunity or a value trap — the F-Score and accruals ratio will be key differentiators. Momentum is confirming the value — this is the Trending Value signal that O'Shaughnessy found to be among the most powerful.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends8 snapshots
Factor Persistence8 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.820 | —3 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.700 | —3 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.710 | —2 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.710 | —8 | — | |
| F-Score | 4.000 | —8 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.520 | —0 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.422 | —8 | — |
Value Lens2021-07-27 → 2026-07-26
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
Price / Book
0.12
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
8.4%
Return on Assets
0.8%
Net Margin
11.5%
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.381
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
6.9%
12M Return
58.1%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
63.7%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
1.51
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
11.4%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-4.6%
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
4
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
30
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
31
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
31
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity