Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/bb47c8d3-7a58-4ce5-80c1-df057bca235b/

RDVT

Red Violet Inc
Chart
69.38 USD
Latest Week 2026-07-31
Snapshot 2026-07-26 · 1.0w · Fresh
0.43
OS Score
2.0%
Value
99.0%
Quality
79.0%
Momentum
7/9
F-Score
0.141
QV
Strategy Eligibility
2 of 23 passing
OS Composite
Trending Value
Quality × Value
🏛
Cornerstone Value
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
💎
Deep Value
VC2 Cheapest
📐
EBITDA/EV
Veiled Value
Piotroski Bargains
🔬
Quality Compounders
📈
Consistent Earners
🌱
GARP
🔄
Shareholder Yield
💰
High Yield
🚀
Momentum Leaders
12-1 36%
Market Leaders
Tiny Titans
🔍
Small Cap Value
🛡
Low Volatility
🏷
Sector Cheapest
🧠
Capital Allocators
CAQ 0.59
Risk-Adj Momentum
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
2.0%ile
P/E
60.9×
P/S
9.1×
P/B
8.2×
E/P
0.0194
FCF Yield
0.049
EBITDA/EV
0.026
SH Yield
0.009
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
98.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
98.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
98.00000000
/100
P/E of 60.9x is premium-priced — the market is paying up for expected growth. VC2 score of 98.00000000/100 — expensive across all six composite measures.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
99.0%ile
ROE
0.135
ROA
0.125
Net Margin
0.150
Op Margin
0.169
GPA
0.727
D/E
0.08
Current
11.22
F-Score
7/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.181
Earn Growth
0.629
Stability
0.417
lower=better
Accruals
-0.149
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
Conservative balance sheet with D/E of 0.08.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
79.0%ile
6M Return
26.2%
12M Return
36.9%
12-1 Mom
35.6%
Risk-Adj
0.74
Vol 252d
48.1%
Vol 60d
117.4%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-40.0%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of 36% is very strong — a clear uptrend. Near-term vol (117%) is expanding vs long-term (48%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.43
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
Sector Context
Technology · 500 peers
Sector Value %ile
8.6%
Sector Quality %ile
100.0%
P/E z-score
0.01
P/B z-score
-0.05
Sector Avg OS
51.5%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson B ADR 99.0% 99.0% 93.0% 78.0%
TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing 99.0% 98.0% 98.0% 90.0%
ASX ASE Industrial Holding Co Ltd ADR 99.0% 98.0% 84.0% 98.0%
TOYO TOYO Co., Ltd Ordinary Shares 99.0% 97.0% 97.0% 82.0%
UMC United Microelectronics 99.0% 99.0% 80.0% 97.0%
CCSI Consensus Cloud Solutions Inc 98.0% 87.0% 98.0% 91.0%
VISN CommScope Holding Company, Inc. 98.0% 95.0% 77.0% 98.0%
KARO Karooooo Ltd 98.0% 98.0% 98.0% 72.0%
Factor Interactions
Quality Momentum — Expensive
Strong quality (99th) and momentum (79th) but expensive (2th value). Premium priced — watch for mean reversion.
Quality at a Premium
High quality (99th) but expensive (2th value). Upside may be limited without earnings growth.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (117%) significantly exceeds 252-day (48%). Near-term risk is elevated.
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
F
19.5% avg (7 factors)
Quality
A
78.5% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
B
67.2% avg (4 factors)
Risk
D
36.5% avg (1 factors)
High quality business commanding a premium price. The market recognises the quality — returns from here depend on continued fundamental execution. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends8 snapshots
Factor Persistence8 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.430—0
Value %ile0.020—8
Quality %ile0.990—8
Momentum %ile0.790—4
F-Score7.000—8
Confidence0.958—8
Volatility0.481—8
Value Lens2021-07-27 → 2026-07-26
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
60.89
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0194
Price / Sales
9.13
Price / Book
8.21
Price / Cash Flow
27.76
FCF Yield
4.9%
EBITDA / EV
2.6%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.1150
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
0.9%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
13.5%
Return on Assets
12.5%
Net Margin
15.0%
Operating Margin
16.9%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
72.7%
Debt / Equity
0.08
Current Ratio
11.22
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.149
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
26.2%
12M Return
36.9%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
35.6%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
0.74
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
18.1%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
62.9%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.417
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
7
Dividend Yield
0.5%
Buyback Yield
0.4%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
98
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
98
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
98
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity