Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/c3d0f71b-641c-43dc-af0f-47a361aaf68c/
BBD
Banco Bradesco SA ADRSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
11 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
OS 0.860
↗
Trending Value
#40.00000000
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
Div 30.6%
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
P/S 0.1
💎
Deep Value
P/E 1.6
◇
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 5.00000000
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
Noneyr
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
30.6%
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
12-1 41%
◉
Market Leaders
Yes
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
RAM 1.20
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
92.0%ile
P/E
1.6×
P/S
0.1×
P/B
1.0×
E/P
0.6412
FCF Yield
-0.025
SH Yield
0.306
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
9.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
5.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
5.00000000
/100
P/E of 1.6x places this firmly in deep value territory. Negative FCF yield (-2.5%) — the business is currently cash-consumptive. VC2 score of 5.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
17.0%ile
ROE
0.662
ROA
0.049
Net Margin
0.063
Op Margin
-0.012
GPA
0.260
D/E
12.54
Current
0.33
F-Score
6/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.393
Earn Growth
0.216
Stability
0.147
lower=better
Accruals
0.098
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
ROE of 66% is exceptional. Highly leveraged with D/E of 12.54 — returns are being amplified by debt. Accruals ratio of 0.098 is elevated — earnings quality may be lower than headline numbers suggest.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
77.0%ile
6M Return
5.7%
12M Return
26.1%
12-1 Mom
40.6%
Risk-Adj
1.20
Vol 252d
34.0%
Vol 60d
82.5%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-20.0%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of 41% is very strong — a clear uptrend. Near-term vol (82%) is expanding vs long-term (34%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.86
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Financial Services
· 500 peers
Sector Value %ile
82.4%
Sector Quality %ile
2.6%
P/E z-score
-0.60
P/B z-score
-0.07
Sector Avg OS
86.5%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
Factor Interactions
Trending Value Signal
Cheap (92th value) with strong momentum (77th). The market is starting to recognise the value.
Cheap for a Reason?
Looks cheap (92th value) but weak quality (17th). Classic value trap risk.
Growth at Reasonable Price
Revenue growing 39% with P/E of 2×. Growth isn't fully priced in.
Leveraged Returns
Strong ROE (66%) boosted by high leverage (D/E 12.5). Returns look good but come with balance sheet risk.
Earnings Quality Concern
ROE looks strong (66%) but high accruals (0.098) suggests earnings are accrual-heavy, not cash-backed.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (82%) significantly exceeds 252-day (34%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
82.1% avg (6 factors)
Quality
D
30.7% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
B
62.3% avg (4 factors)
Risk
B
60.1% avg (1 factors)
Deep value territory, but quality is concerning. This is either a turnaround opportunity or a value trap — the F-Score and accruals ratio will be key differentiators.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.860 | —1 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.920 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.170 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.770 | —1 | — | |
| F-Score | 6.000 | —0 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.939 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.340 | —0 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
1.56
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.6412
Price / Sales
0.10
Price / Book
1.03
FCF Yield
-2.5%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.6474
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
30.6%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
66.2%
Return on Assets
4.9%
Net Margin
6.3%
Operating Margin
-1.2%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
26.0%
Debt / Equity
12.54
Current Ratio
0.33
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.098
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
5.7%
12M Return
26.1%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
40.6%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
1.20
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
39.3%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
21.6%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.147
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
6
Dividend Yield
30.6%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
9
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
5
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
5
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
40
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
Yes
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity