Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/d52d5055-b960-418b-a460-adc9882ed059/

FSLR

First Solar Inc
Chart
227.83 USD
Latest Week 2026-07-10
Snapshot 2026-07-12 · 0.9w · Fresh
0.95
OS Score
74.0%
Value
94.0%
Quality
88.0%
Momentum
7/9
F-Score
0.834
QV
Strategy Eligibility
10 of 23 passing
OS Composite
OS 0.950
Trending Value
Quality × Value
QV 0.834
🏛
Cornerstone Value
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
💎
Deep Value
P/E 14.7
VC2 Cheapest
📐
EBITDA/EV
10.3%
Veiled Value
Piotroski Bargains
F7
🔬
Quality Compounders
ROE 17%
📈
Consistent Earners
Yes
🌱
GARP
Rev +27%
🔄
Shareholder Yield
💰
High Yield
🚀
Momentum Leaders
12-1 65%
Market Leaders
Tiny Titans
🔍
Small Cap Value
🛡
Low Volatility
🏷
Sector Cheapest
🧠
Capital Allocators
Risk-Adj Momentum
RAM 1.40
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
74.0%ile
P/E
14.7×
P/S
4.5×
P/B
2.5×
E/P
0.0781
FCF Yield
0.143
EBITDA/EV
0.103
SH Yield
0.000
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
36.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
68.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
65.00000000
/100
FCF yield of 14.3% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
94.0%ile
ROE
0.169
ROA
0.125
Net Margin
0.307
Op Margin
0.325
GPA
0.169
D/E
0.35
Current
2.56
F-Score
7/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.273
Earn Growth
0.316
Stability
0.256
lower=better
Accruals
-0.059
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
Conservative balance sheet with D/E of 0.35.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
88.0%ile
6M Return
-4.5%
12M Return
40.3%
12-1 Mom
64.6%
Risk-Adj
1.40
Vol 252d
46.1%
Vol 60d
112.3%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-31.0%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of 65% is very strong — a clear uptrend. Near-term vol (112%) is expanding vs long-term (46%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.95
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
Sector Context
Technology · 500 peers
Sector Value %ile
80.4%
Sector Quality %ile
90.2%
P/E z-score
-0.16
P/B z-score
-0.18
Sector Avg OS
52.8%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
ASX ASE Industrial Holding Co Ltd ADR 99.0% 98.0% 86.0% 97.0%
TOYO TOYO Co., Ltd Ordinary Shares 99.0% 97.0% 97.0% 93.0%
KARO Karooooo Ltd 99.0% 98.0% 98.0% 70.0%
PLAB Photronics Inc 98.0% 94.0% 85.0% 89.0%
CCSI Consensus Cloud Solutions Inc 98.0% 86.0% 98.0% 92.0%
VISN CommScope Holding Company, Inc. 98.0% 94.0% 74.0% 98.0%
ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson B ADR 98.0% 98.0% 77.0% 88.0%
TDC Teradata Corp 97.0% 88.0% 96.0% 79.0%
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (74th) and quality (94th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Trending Value Signal
Cheap (74th value) with strong momentum (88th). The market is starting to recognise the value.
Growth at Reasonable Price
Revenue growing 27% with P/E of 15×. Growth isn't fully priced in.
Hot but Volatile
Strong momentum (88th) but high volatility (46%). Momentum could reverse sharply.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (112%) significantly exceeds 252-day (46%). Near-term risk is elevated.
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
B
62.5% avg (7 factors)
Quality
A
75.2% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
B
67.5% avg (4 factors)
Risk
D
39.9% avg (1 factors)
This stock sits in the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot — cheap AND high quality. Historically, this combination has generated the strongest long-term returns. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends6 snapshots
Factor Persistence6 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.950—6
Value %ile0.740—3
Quality %ile0.940—6
Momentum %ile0.880—6
F-Score7.000—6
Confidence0.951—6
Volatility0.461—6
Value Lens2021-07-13 → 2026-07-12
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
14.70
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0781
Price / Sales
4.52
Price / Book
2.48
Price / Cash Flow
9.99
FCF Yield
14.3%
EBITDA / EV
10.3%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.2404
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
0.0%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
16.9%
Return on Assets
12.5%
Net Margin
30.7%
Operating Margin
32.5%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
16.9%
Debt / Equity
0.35
Current Ratio
2.56
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.059
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-4.5%
12M Return
40.3%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
64.6%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
1.40
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
27.3%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
31.6%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.256
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
7
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
36
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
68
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
65
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity