Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/db68559a-439c-49dc-a3de-349ad1fb4cad/

BOQ

Bank of Queensland Limited
Chart
6.64 AUD
Latest Week 2026-07-31
Snapshot 2026-07-26 · 1.4w · Fresh
0.47
OS Score
86.0%
Value
7.0%
Quality
14.0%
Momentum
#27.00000000
TV Rank
3/9
F-Score
0.245
QV
Strategy Eligibility
3 of 23 passing
OS Composite
Trending Value
#27
Quality × Value
🏛
Cornerstone Value
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
💎
Deep Value
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 8
📐
EBITDA/EV
Veiled Value
Piotroski Bargains
🔬
Quality Compounders
📈
Consistent Earners
🌱
GARP
🔄
Shareholder Yield
6.5%
💰
High Yield
🚀
Momentum Leaders
Market Leaders
Tiny Titans
🔍
Small Cap Value
🛡
Low Volatility
🏷
Sector Cheapest
🧠
Capital Allocators
Risk-Adj Momentum
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
86.0%ile
P/E
14.7×
P/S
2.6×
P/B
0.7×
FCF Yield
-0.066
SH Yield
0.065
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
11.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
8.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
7.00000000
/100
Negative FCF yield (-6.6%) — the business is currently cash-consumptive. VC2 score of 8.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
7.0%ile
ROE
0.048
ROA
0.003
Net Margin
0.178
F-Score
3/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
-0.090
Earn Growth
1.282
Accruals
0.012
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
14.0%ile
6M Return
-3.1%
12M Return
-9.6%
12-1 Mom
-11.5%
Risk-Adj
-0.56
Vol 252d
20.6%
Vol 60d
42.6%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-20.4%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of -11% signals a downtrend — price is moving against you. Near-term vol (43%) is expanding vs long-term (21%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.47
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
Sector Context
Financial Services · 159 peers
Sector Value %ile
75.0%
Sector Quality %ile
3.8%
P/E z-score
-0.24
P/B z-score
-0.09
Sector Avg OS
56.9%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
HLI Helia Group Limited 99.0% 97.0% 96.0% 91.0%
TWR Tower Limited 99.0% 98.0% 95.0% 87.0%
SVR Solvar Limited 98.0% 96.0% 96.0% 86.0%
ACQ Acorn Capital Investment Fund Limited 97.0% 93.0% 88.0% 87.0%
IAG Insurance Australia Group Limited 97.0% 92.0% 95.0% 83.0%
KSL Kina Securities Limited 97.0% 96.0% 85.0% 85.0%
BFL BSP Financial Group Limited 97.0% 95.0% 90.0% 82.0%
FSA FSA Group Limited 97.0% 86.0% 96.0% 94.0%
Factor Interactions
Cheap for a Reason?
Looks cheap (86th value) but weak quality (7th). Classic value trap risk.
Falling Knife
Weak momentum (14th) despite looking cheap (86th value). Wait for momentum to stabilise.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (43%) significantly exceeds 252-day (21%). Near-term risk is elevated.
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
B
68.6% avg (5 factors)
Quality
D
36.7% avg (4 factors)
Momentum
F
21.3% avg (4 factors)
Risk
A
82.4% avg (1 factors)
Deep value territory, but quality is concerning. This is either a turnaround opportunity or a value trap — the F-Score and accruals ratio will be key differentiators. Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends8 snapshots
Factor Persistence8 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.470—0
Value %ile0.860—8
Quality %ile0.070—8
Momentum %ile0.140—8
F-Score3.000—8
Confidence0.607—0
Volatility0.206—0
Value Lens2021-07-27 → 2026-07-26
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
14.70
Price / Sales
2.62
Price / Book
0.71
FCF Yield
-6.6%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.1000
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
6.5%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
4.8%
Return on Assets
0.3%
Net Margin
17.8%
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.012
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-3.1%
12M Return
-9.6%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-11.5%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-0.56
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-9.0%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
128.2%
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
3
Dividend Yield
6.3%
Buyback Yield
0.2%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
11
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
8
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
7
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
27
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity