Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/ec5f83f6-923d-4e83-b218-9af5b883c6d1/

PICS

Picpay Holdings Netherlands N.V. Class A Common Shares
Chart
$9.18
Latest Week 2026-06-05
Snapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
0.72
OS Score
90.0%
Value
19.0%
Quality
42.0%
Momentum
5/9
F-Score
0.414
QV
Strategy Eligibility
1 of 23 passing
OS Composite
Trending Value
Quality × Value
🏛
Cornerstone Value
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
💎
Deep Value
VC2 Cheapest
📐
EBITDA/EV
Veiled Value
Piotroski Bargains
🔬
Quality Compounders
📈
Consistent Earners
🌱
GARP
🔄
Shareholder Yield
💰
High Yield
🚀
Momentum Leaders
Market Leaders
Tiny Titans
🔍
Small Cap Value
Val 90th
🛡
Low Volatility
🏷
Sector Cheapest
🧠
Capital Allocators
Risk-Adj Momentum
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
90.0%ile
P/E
1.0×
P/S
0.2×
P/B
0.2×
E/P
0.9837
FCF Yield
-1.690
SH Yield
-2.399
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
6.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
16.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
16.00000000
/100
P/E of 1.0x places this firmly in deep value territory. Negative FCF yield (-169.0%) — the business is currently cash-consumptive.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
19.0%ile
ROE
0.193
ROA
0.025
Net Margin
0.160
F-Score
5/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.650
Earn Growth
4.017
Stability
1.269
lower=better
Accruals
0.054
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
42.0%ile
Vol 252d
88.9%
Vol 60d
89.4%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-46.3%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.72
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
Sector Context
Technology · 500 peers
Sector Value %ile
92.6%
Sector Quality %ile
13.6%
P/E z-score
-0.21
P/B z-score
-0.12
Sector Avg OS
53.4%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
JFU 9F Inc 99.0% 98.0% 82.0% 93.0%
ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson B ADR 99.0% 98.0% 92.0% 84.0%
ASX ASE Industrial Holding Co Ltd ADR 99.0% 99.0% 89.0% 97.0%
UMC United Microelectronics 99.0% 99.0% 82.0% 95.0%
PLAB Photronics Inc 98.0% 94.0% 87.0% 90.0%
TOYO TOYO Co., Ltd Ordinary Shares 98.0% 83.0% 97.0% 98.0%
DSWL Deswell Industries Inc 98.0% 98.0% 80.0% 85.0%
CCSI Consensus Cloud Solutions Inc 97.0% 86.0% 98.0% 83.0%
Factor Interactions
Cheap for a Reason?
Looks cheap (90th value) but weak quality (19th). Classic value trap risk.
Growth at Reasonable Price
Revenue growing 65% with P/E of 1×. Growth isn't fully priced in.
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
B
66.7% avg (6 factors)
Quality
D
44.0% avg (4 factors)
Risk
F
0.0% avg (1 factors)
Deep value territory, but quality is concerning. This is either a turnaround opportunity or a value trap — the F-Score and accruals ratio will be key differentiators. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.720—1
Value %ile0.900—1
Quality %ile0.190—1
Momentum %ile0.420—0
F-Score5.000—0
Confidence0.636—0
Volatility0.889—1
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
1.02
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.9837
Price / Sales
0.16
Price / Book
0.20
FCF Yield
-169.0%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
6.1467
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
-239.9%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
19.3%
Return on Assets
2.5%
Net Margin
16.0%
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.054
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
65.0%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
401.7%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
1.269
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
5
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
-239.9%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
6
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
16
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
16
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity