Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/97b77946-5802-4327-ba73-6d5fcabf5726/
GFUZ
General Fusion Group Ltd. Cl ASnapshot 2026-08-02 · 0.9w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
3 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
OS 0.800
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
QV 0.630
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
Val 64%
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
64.0%ile
FCF Yield
-0.031
SH Yield
-0.021
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
37.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
37.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
37.00000000
/100
Negative FCF yield (-3.1%) — the business is currently cash-consumptive.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
62.0%ile
ROE
0.180
ROA
-0.519
D/E
-1.35
Current
0.65
F-Score
5/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Accruals
-0.122
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
Conservative balance sheet with D/E of -1.35.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
65.0%ile
Max DD 12M
-26.2%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.8
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Industrials
· 500 peers
Sector Value %ile
64.9%
Sector Quality %ile
57.7%
Sector Avg OS
51.6%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
F
0.0% avg (2 factors)
Quality
C
51.5% avg (5 factors)
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.800 | —1 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.640 | —0 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.620 | —0 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.650 | —0 | — | |
| F-Score | 5.000 | —0 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.294 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | — | —0 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
FCF Yield
-3.1%
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
-2.1%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
18.0%
Return on Assets
-51.9%
Debt / Equity
-1.35
Current Ratio
0.65
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.122
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
5
Buyback Yield
-2.1%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
37
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
37
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
37
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity