Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/a04a3308-b8c8-42e4-b281-40f64c55730f/
ACT
Aduro Clean Technologies Inc.Snapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
0 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
57.0%ile
P/S
2721.9×
P/B
16.3×
FCF Yield
-0.025
SH Yield
-0.071
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
43.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
43.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
43.00000000
/100
Negative FCF yield (-2.5%) — the business is currently cash-consumptive.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
58.0%ile
ROE
-0.450
ROA
-0.372
Net Margin
-74.967
Op Margin
-72.231
Current
75.10
F-Score
3/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
-0.315
Stability
0.510
lower=better
Accruals
-0.161
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
59.0%ile
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.68
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Industrials
· 62 peers
Sector Value %ile
68.3%
Sector Quality %ile
57.1%
P/B z-score
4.63
Sector Avg OS
39.1%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
F
0.0% avg (4 factors)
Quality
D
33.3% avg (6 factors)
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.680 | —0 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.570 | —0 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.580 | —0 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.590 | —0 | — | |
| F-Score | 3.000 | —1 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.568 | —0 | — | |
| Volatility | — | —0 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
Price / Sales
2721.88
Price / Book
16.33
FCF Yield
-2.5%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.0004
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
-7.1%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
-45.0%
Return on Assets
-37.2%
Net Margin
-7496.7%
Operating Margin
-7223.1%
Current Ratio
75.10
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.161
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-31.5%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.510
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
3
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
-7.1%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
43
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
43
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
43
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity