Industry ownership intelligence

Railroads insider conviction

Executive and director activity assessed across 8 companies for breadth, transaction quality, clustering, freshness, and directional conviction.

40/100

Distribution bias

88/100 confidence
Level
Industry
Evidence window
Latest 90 days
Named insiders
72
Latest evidence
5 Aug 2026

Capital positioning read

Distribution bias

Priced common-share disposals are concentrated enough to warrant review, but they are not treated as a standalone bearish forecast.

Demand a stronger confirmation bar

Evidence in favour

  • 18 distinct acquisition events survive duplicate and security-type controls.
  • Participation spans 72 named insiders rather than one filing source.
  • The latest qualifying evidence is fresh, dated 05 Aug 2026.

Decision risks

  • Qualifying disposal events outnumber acquisitions, although disposals receive a lower directional weight.
Conviction40Distribution bias
Confidence88Deep evidence
Controlled events73directional common-share events
Company breadth8represented companies
Acquisition value$4.7Mnormalized amount
Disposal value$19.9Mnormalized amount

Flow regime

Twelve-week filing pressure

Shows the cadence and balance of the full filing tape.

025 May
1501 Jun
1408 Jun
215 Jun
022 Jun
1829 Jun
1406 Jul
313 Jul
1020 Jul
227 Jul
903 Aug
010 Aug
AcquisitionsDisposalsScore 40 · Confidence 88

Relative positioning

Industry peer map

Current score with confidence.

Directional balance

Controlled event mix

24.7%acquisition
Acquisition events
18
Disposal events
55
Net value
-$15.1M

Evidence quality

What the filings represent

Common equity95
Equity compensation36
Options and derivatives3
Other securities0

Decision makers

Role participation

Director48
CEO and chair30
Other or unspecified24
Other executive20
Finance leadership12

Quality controls

Evidence usability

Normalized values
79%
Priced common share
55%
Named insiders
72
Controlled events
73

Auditable evidence

Latest Railroads filings

Showing 121 to 134 of 134.

TRNTrinity Industries Inc
GOODING, AARON J.EVP Leasing and Services
DisposalCommon equity
$58.5KDirectional evidence
NSCNorfolk Southern Corporation
DONADIO, MARCELA EDirector
AcquisitionEquity compensation
$11.7KContext evidence
NSCNorfolk Southern Corporation
HUFFARD, JOHN C JRDirector
AcquisitionEquity compensation
$7.1KContext evidence
NSCNorfolk Southern Corporation
JONES, CHRISTOPHER TDirector
AcquisitionEquity compensation
$7.1KContext evidence
NSCNorfolk Southern Corporation
HUFFARD, JOHN C JRDirector
AcquisitionEquity compensation
$4.0KContext evidence
NSCNorfolk Southern Corporation
DAVIDSON, PHILLIP SDirector
AcquisitionEquity compensation
$3.4KContext evidence
NSCNorfolk Southern Corporation
ANDERSON, RICHARD HDirector
AcquisitionEquity compensation
$3.2KContext evidence
NSCNorfolk Southern Corporation
DEBIASE, FRANCESCA A.Director
AcquisitionEquity compensation
$2.9KContext evidence
NSCNorfolk Southern Corporation
CLYBURN, WILLIAM JR.Director
AcquisitionEquity compensation
$2.5KContext evidence
NSCNorfolk Southern Corporation
FAHMY, SAMEHDirector
AcquisitionEquity compensation
$2.5KContext evidence
NSCNorfolk Southern Corporation
HEITKAMP, MARY KATHRYNDirector
AcquisitionEquity compensation
$2.5KContext evidence
NSCNorfolk Southern Corporation
ANDERSON, RICHARD HDirector
AcquisitionEquity compensation
$2.0KContext evidence
NSCNorfolk Southern Corporation
RYERKERK, LORIDirector
AcquisitionEquity compensation
$969Context evidence
NSCNorfolk Southern Corporation
LAMPHERE, GILBERT HDirector
AcquisitionEquity compensation
$843Context evidence

Group-level method

Breadth before headline value

Company breadth

A sector or industry score must be supported across companies. One very large filing cannot manufacture broad conviction.

Economic duplicates

Matching company, date, side, security class, share count, and value records are consolidated for the directional calculation.

Evidence hierarchy

Priced common-share activity determines direction. Compensation and derivative records are mapped separately so ownership mechanics remain visible.

Positioning use

The score identifies where insider alignment merits research or where disposal concentration needs review. Price, trend, valuation, and portfolio risk still decide positioning.

Independent market research for education. This classification is not investment advice, a recommendation, a forecast, or an execution instruction.

Evidence context