Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/2b968e33-9e6e-4a8e-ad88-5c0049debe78/
IBR
Iron Bear Resources LtdSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
0 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
43.0%ile
P/S
3429.4×
P/B
8.3×
FCF Yield
-0.036
SH Yield
-0.019
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
57.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
57.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
56.00000000
/100
Negative FCF yield (-3.6%) — the business is currently cash-consumptive.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
42.0%ile
ROE
-0.633
ROA
-0.434
Net Margin
-263.101
Op Margin
-112.606
GPA
0.002
Current
0.91
F-Score
0/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
5yr Consist
No
F-Score of 0/9 flags fundamental deterioration — multiple signals are weakening.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
43.0%ile
Vol 252d
56.1%
Vol 60d
60.4%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-18.0%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.39
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Basic Materials
· 500 peers
Sector Value %ile
20.4%
Sector Quality %ile
20.2%
P/B z-score
0.03
Sector Avg OS
63.4%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
F
0.0% avg (4 factors)
Quality
F
2.8% avg (6 factors)
Risk
F
23.2% avg (1 factors)
Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.390 | —0 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.430 | —0 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.420 | —0 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.430 | —0 | — | |
| F-Score | 0.000 | —1 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.182 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.561 | —1 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
Price / Sales
3429.39
Price / Book
8.25
FCF Yield
-3.6%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.0003
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
-1.9%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
-63.3%
Return on Assets
-43.4%
Net Margin
-26310.1%
Operating Margin
-11260.6%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
0.2%
Current Ratio
0.91
External Financing
Net issuance — lower=better
0.115
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
0
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
-1.9%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
57
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
57
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
56
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity