Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/2bf3d27a-4f3f-4915-a841-998ac6494d8f/
APOLLO
Apollo Micro Systems LimitedSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
0 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
2.0%ile
P/E
157.1×
P/S
17.9×
P/B
11.5×
E/P
0.0064
FCF Yield
-0.023
EBITDA/EV
0.012
SH Yield
-0.039
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
96.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
99.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
98.00000000
/100
P/E of 157.1x is premium-priced — the market is paying up for expected growth. Negative FCF yield (-2.3%) — the business is currently cash-consumptive. VC2 score of 99.00000000/100 — expensive across all six composite measures.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
10.0%ile
ROE
0.073
ROA
0.040
Net Margin
0.114
Op Margin
0.206
GPA
0.102
Current
1.90
F-Score
5/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.609
Earn Growth
0.718
Stability
0.407
lower=better
Accruals
0.095
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
Accruals ratio of 0.095 is elevated — earnings quality may be lower than headline numbers suggest.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
96.0%ile
6M Return
60.9%
12M Return
105.7%
12-1 Mom
58.6%
Risk-Adj
0.92
Vol 252d
63.4%
Vol 60d
140.4%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-44.9%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of 59% is very strong — a clear uptrend. Near-term vol (140%) is expanding vs long-term (63%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.1
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Industrials
· 468 peers
Sector Value %ile
4.7%
Sector Quality %ile
10.7%
P/E z-score
1.18
P/B z-score
0.39
Sector Avg OS
44.9%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
| Symbol | Name | OS | Value | Quality | Momentum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GESHIP | 99.0% | 93.0% | 90.0% | 94.0% | |
| CORDSCABLE | 98.0% | 96.0% | 72.0% | 79.0% | |
| SAHYADRI | 98.0% | 99.0% | 87.0% | 67.0% | |
| UNIPARTS | 97.0% | 73.0% | 95.0% | 96.0% | |
| NELCAST | 97.0% | 84.0% | 86.0% | 79.0% | |
| MAHESHWARI | 97.0% | 97.0% | 62.0% | 76.0% | |
| NAVA | 96.0% | 80.0% | 85.0% | 85.0% | |
| SOMANYCERA | 96.0% | 82.0% | 89.0% | 77.0% |
Factor Interactions
Hot but Volatile
Strong momentum (96th) but high volatility (63%). Momentum could reverse sharply.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (140%) significantly exceeds 252-day (63%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
F
1.4% avg (7 factors)
Quality
D
38.2% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
A
87.0% avg (4 factors)
Risk
F
10.9% avg (1 factors)
Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.100 | —1 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.020 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.100 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.960 | —1 | — | |
| F-Score | 5.000 | —0 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.909 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.634 | —1 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
157.12
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0064
Price / Sales
17.90
Price / Book
11.46
FCF Yield
-2.3%
EBITDA / EV
1.2%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.0542
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
-3.9%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
7.3%
Return on Assets
4.0%
Net Margin
11.4%
Operating Margin
20.6%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
10.2%
Current Ratio
1.90
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.095
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
60.9%
12M Return
105.7%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
58.6%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
0.92
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
60.9%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
71.8%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.407
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
5
Dividend Yield
0.1%
Buyback Yield
-4.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
96
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
99
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
98
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity