Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/2db195d8-8dbe-46ad-b607-1f70385b5c67/
GTLINFRA
GTL Infrastructure LimitedSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
4 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
OS 0.940
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
QV 0.758
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
P/E 2.6
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
20.2%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
87.0%ile
P/E
2.6×
P/S
1.5×
E/P
0.3779
FCF Yield
0.060
EBITDA/EV
0.202
SH Yield
0.000
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
8.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
11.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
4.00000000
/100
P/E of 2.6x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 6.0% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
66.0%ile
ROE
-0.149
ROA
0.249
Net Margin
0.568
Op Margin
0.116
GPA
0.183
Current
0.10
F-Score
6/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.021
Stability
5.779
lower=better
Accruals
0.078
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
73.0%ile
6M Return
24.8%
12M Return
8.1%
12-1 Mom
-7.4%
Risk-Adj
-0.17
Vol 252d
44.2%
Vol 60d
103.2%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-47.1%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (103%) is expanding vs long-term (44%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.94
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Technology
· 181 peers
Sector Value %ile
93.4%
Sector Quality %ile
65.9%
P/E z-score
-0.32
Sector Avg OS
43.7%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
| Symbol | Name | OS | Value | Quality | Momentum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAAREEINDO | 96.0% | 78.0% | 89.0% | 86.0% | |
| RPSGVENT | 95.0% | 92.0% | 61.0% | 75.0% | |
| DATAMATICS | 94.0% | 67.0% | 91.0% | 90.0% | |
| INFOBEAN | 94.0% | 65.0% | 91.0% | 96.0% | |
| SIGMA | 93.0% | 67.0% | 95.0% | 81.0% | |
| ONWARDTEC | 92.0% | 91.0% | 85.0% | 36.0% | |
| RPTECH | 92.0% | 88.0% | 34.0% | 96.0% | |
| IVALUE | 92.0% | 92.0% | 69.0% | 51.0% |
Factor Interactions
Trending Value Signal
Cheap (87th value) with strong momentum (73th). The market is starting to recognise the value.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (103%) significantly exceeds 252-day (44%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
76.7% avg (6 factors)
Quality
D
44.7% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
D
38.8% avg (4 factors)
Risk
D
43.0% avg (1 factors)
Deep value territory, but quality is concerning. This is either a turnaround opportunity or a value trap — the F-Score and accruals ratio will be key differentiators. Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.940 | —1 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.870 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.660 | —0 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.730 | —1 | — | |
| F-Score | 6.000 | —0 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.848 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.442 | —1 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
2.65
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.3779
Price / Sales
1.50
Price / Cash Flow
3.85
FCF Yield
6.0%
EBITDA / EV
20.2%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.1749
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
0.0%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
-14.9%
Return on Assets
24.9%
Net Margin
56.8%
Operating Margin
11.6%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
18.3%
Current Ratio
0.10
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.078
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
24.8%
12M Return
8.1%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-7.4%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-0.17
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
2.1%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
5.779
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
6
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
8
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
11
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
4
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity