Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/53de6488-715a-4622-abe9-2191e7abab3a/
KPT
KP Tissue Inc.Snapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
5 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
Noneyr
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
5.3%
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
12-1 37%
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
Vol 14%
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
RAM 2.65
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
48.0%ile
P/E
14.7×
P/B
1.8×
FCF Yield
0.000
SH Yield
0.053
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
53.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
53.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
52.00000000
/100
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
48.0%ile
ROE
0.126
ROA
0.123
Current
1.00
F-Score
2/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Earn Growth
2.486
Stability
0.226
lower=better
Accruals
0.123
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
Accruals ratio of 0.123 is elevated — earnings quality may be lower than headline numbers suggest. F-Score of 2/9 flags fundamental deterioration — multiple signals are weakening.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
50.0%ile
6M Return
29.0%
12M Return
57.0%
12-1 Mom
37.0%
Risk-Adj
2.65
Vol 252d
14.0%
Vol 60d
31.7%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-4.2%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of 37% is very strong — a clear uptrend. Risk-adjusted momentum of 2.65 is excellent — strong returns relative to volatility. Near-term vol (32%) is expanding vs long-term (14%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.47
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Consumer Defensive
· 32 peers
Sector Value %ile
21.2%
Sector Quality %ile
18.2%
P/E z-score
-0.51
P/B z-score
-0.36
Sector Avg OS
62.5%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
Factor Interactions
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (32%) significantly exceeds 252-day (14%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
B
61.2% avg (4 factors)
Quality
D
32.0% avg (4 factors)
Momentum
A
86.0% avg (4 factors)
Risk
A
93.3% avg (1 factors)
Deep value territory, but quality is concerning. This is either a turnaround opportunity or a value trap — the F-Score and accruals ratio will be key differentiators. Momentum is confirming the value — this is the Trending Value signal that O'Shaughnessy found to be among the most powerful.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.470 | —0 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.480 | —0 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.480 | —0 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.500 | —0 | — | |
| F-Score | 2.000 | —1 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.667 | —0 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.140 | —1 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
14.67
Price / Book
1.84
FCF Yield
0.0%
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
5.3%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
12.6%
Return on Assets
12.3%
Current Ratio
1.00
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.123
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
29.0%
12M Return
57.0%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
37.0%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
2.65
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Earnings Growth (YoY)
248.6%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.226
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
2
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
53
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
53
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
52
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity