Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/5557d288-eafe-4dbb-a11d-434b1ee4d190/
ASHAPURMIN
Ashapura Minechem LimitedSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
8 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
OS 0.960
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
QV 0.815
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
P/S 1.3
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
F8
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
Noneyr
🌱
GARP
Rev +91%
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
12-1 69%
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
RAM 1.39
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
70.0%ile
P/E
16.7×
P/S
1.3×
P/B
4.1×
E/P
0.0598
FCF Yield
0.023
EBITDA/EV
0.072
SH Yield
0.001
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
30.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
28.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
30.00000000
/100
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
95.0%ile
ROE
0.243
ROA
0.085
Net Margin
0.077
Op Margin
0.081
GPA
0.790
Current
1.36
F-Score
8/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.912
Earn Growth
0.357
Stability
0.128
lower=better
Accruals
-0.013
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
ROE of 24% is exceptional. F-Score of 8/9 indicates strong fundamental improvement across multiple dimensions.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
96.0%ile
6M Return
3.4%
12M Return
73.6%
12-1 Mom
68.9%
Risk-Adj
1.39
Vol 252d
49.7%
Vol 60d
108.9%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-45.9%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of 69% is very strong — a clear uptrend. Near-term vol (109%) is expanding vs long-term (50%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.96
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Basic Materials
· 368 peers
Sector Value %ile
62.6%
Sector Quality %ile
95.9%
P/E z-score
-0.16
P/B z-score
0.22
Sector Avg OS
54.1%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
| Symbol | Name | OS | Value | Quality | Momentum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GULPOLY | 99.0% | 96.0% | 94.0% | 75.0% | |
| JAYNECOIND | 99.0% | 84.0% | 98.0% | 98.0% | |
| ARIES | 99.0% | 97.0% | 96.0% | 77.0% | |
| SAIL | 99.0% | 93.0% | 85.0% | 92.0% | |
| MANAKSTEEL | 98.0% | 96.0% | 72.0% | 78.0% | |
| SANDUMA | 98.0% | 82.0% | 98.0% | 93.0% | |
| TATASTEEL | 98.0% | 81.0% | 91.0% | 89.0% | |
| ANDHRSUGAR | 98.0% | 98.0% | 76.0% | 81.0% |
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (70th) and quality (95th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Trending Value Signal
Cheap (70th value) with strong momentum (96th). The market is starting to recognise the value.
Piotroski + Value Convergence
F-Score 8/9 with good value (70th). Strong fundamental improvement in a cheap stock.
Growth at Reasonable Price
Revenue growing 91% with P/E of 17×. Growth isn't fully priced in.
Hot but Volatile
Strong momentum (96th) but high volatility (50%). Momentum could reverse sharply.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (109%) significantly exceeds 252-day (50%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
C
48.4% avg (7 factors)
Quality
C
55.9% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
A
75.4% avg (4 factors)
Risk
D
33.8% avg (1 factors)
Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.960 | —1 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.700 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.950 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.960 | —1 | — | |
| F-Score | 8.000 | —1 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.939 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.497 | —1 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
16.72
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0598
Price / Sales
1.28
Price / Book
4.07
Price / Cash Flow
14.50
FCF Yield
2.3%
EBITDA / EV
7.2%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.6679
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
0.1%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
24.3%
Return on Assets
8.5%
Net Margin
7.7%
Operating Margin
8.1%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
79.0%
Current Ratio
1.36
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.013
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
3.4%
12M Return
73.6%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
68.9%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
1.39
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
91.2%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
35.7%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.128
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
8
Dividend Yield
0.1%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
30
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
28
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
30
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity