Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/5fb69287-7220-4cf4-96d2-84f39af799fa/

RMC

Resimac Group Limited
Chart
0.83 AUD
Latest Week 2026-06-05
Financial ServicesMortgage FinanceSMALL
Snapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
0.75
OS Score
88.0%
Value
11.0%
Quality
86.0%
Momentum
#39.00000000
TV Rank
3/9
F-Score
0.311
QV
StrategiesValueQualityMomentumCompositeInteractionsFactor AnalysisTrendsFundamentals
Strategy Eligibility
4 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
#39.00000000
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 5.00000000
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
14.9%
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
12-1 22%
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
88.0%ile
P/E
9.5×
P/S
2.1×
P/B
0.9×
FCF Yield
-0.027
SH Yield
0.149
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
9.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
5.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
6.00000000
/100
P/E of 9.5x places this firmly in deep value territory. Negative FCF yield (-2.7%) — the business is currently cash-consumptive. VC2 score of 5.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
11.0%ile
ROE
0.095
ROA
0.002
Net Margin
0.219
F-Score
3/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.156
Earn Growth
0.011
5yr Consist
No
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
86.0%ile
6M Return
-6.9%
12M Return
13.9%
12-1 Mom
22.1%
Risk-Adj
0.81
Vol 252d
27.2%
Vol 60d
59.8%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-22.3%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of 22% is very strong — a clear uptrend. Near-term vol (60%) is expanding vs long-term (27%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.75
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Financial Services · 158 peers
Sector Value %ile
79.9%
Sector Quality %ile
9.4%
P/E z-score
-0.31
P/B z-score
-0.09
Sector Avg OS
58.0%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
TWR Tower Limited 99.0% 98.0% 96.0% 91.0%
HUM Humm Group Limited 98.0% 96.0% 89.0% 91.0%
HLI Helia Group Limited 98.0% 97.0% 96.0% 86.0%
LFG Liberty Financial Group Limited 98.0% 94.0% 98.0% 86.0%
BFL BSP Financial Group Limited 97.0% 95.0% 89.0% 87.0%
ACQ Acorn Capital Investment Fund Limited 97.0% 92.0% 88.0% 90.0%
KSL Kina Securities Limited 97.0% 96.0% 85.0% 86.0%
HGH Heartland Group Holdings Limited 96.0% 89.0% 84.0% 92.0%
Factor Interactions
Trending Value Signal
Cheap (88th value) with strong momentum (86th). The market is starting to recognise the value.
Cheap for a Reason?
Looks cheap (88th value) but weak quality (11th). Classic value trap risk.
Growth at Reasonable Price
Revenue growing 16% with P/E of 9×. Growth isn't fully priced in.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (60%) significantly exceeds 252-day (27%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
B
74.5% avg (5 factors)
Quality
D
39.3% avg (3 factors)
Momentum
C
46.4% avg (4 factors)
Risk
B
71.4% avg (1 factors)
Deep value territory, but quality is concerning. This is either a turnaround opportunity or a value trap — the F-Score and accruals ratio will be key differentiators.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.750—1—
Value %ile0.880—1—
Quality %ile0.110—1—
Momentum %ile0.860—1—
F-Score3.000—1—
Confidence0.387—1—
Volatility0.272—0—
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
9.49
Price / Sales
2.08
Price / Book
0.90
FCF Yield
-2.7%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.0099
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
14.9%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
9.5%
Return on Assets
0.2%
Net Margin
21.9%
External Financing
Net issuance — lower=better
0.000
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-6.9%
12M Return
13.9%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
22.1%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
0.81
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
15.6%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
1.1%
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
3
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
1.2%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
9
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
5
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
6
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
39
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity