Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/81230922-c60e-44c2-a528-cc6e51372215/
DEN
DEN Networks LimitedSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
4 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
P/S 1.3
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 9.00000000
📐
EBITDA/EV
25.0%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
Noneyr
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
93.0%ile
P/E
6.8×
P/S
1.3×
P/B
0.3×
E/P
0.1476
FCF Yield
-0.044
EBITDA/EV
0.250
SH Yield
0.000
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
7.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
9.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
11.00000000
/100
P/E of 6.8x places this firmly in deep value territory. Negative FCF yield (-4.4%) — the business is currently cash-consumptive. VC2 score of 9.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
7.0%ile
ROE
0.051
ROA
0.045
Net Margin
0.197
Op Margin
-0.017
GPA
0.086
Current
8.36
F-Score
4/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
-0.031
Earn Growth
-0.171
Stability
0.235
lower=better
Accruals
0.049
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
17.0%ile
6M Return
-12.5%
12M Return
-25.1%
12-1 Mom
-24.3%
Risk-Adj
-0.80
Vol 252d
30.3%
Vol 60d
65.3%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-40.7%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of -24% signals a downtrend — price is moving against you. Near-term vol (65%) is expanding vs long-term (30%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.58
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Communication Services
· 74 peers
Sector Value %ile
90.7%
Sector Quality %ile
2.7%
P/E z-score
-0.27
P/B z-score
-0.58
Sector Avg OS
56.4%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
| Symbol | Name | OS | Value | Quality | Momentum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UFO | 98.0% | 97.0% | 74.0% | 77.0% | |
| INDUSTOWER | 97.0% | 82.0% | 98.0% | 77.0% | |
| NAVNETEDUL | 96.0% | 93.0% | 71.0% | 74.0% | |
| JAGRAN | 94.0% | 98.0% | 87.0% | 32.0% | |
| IDEA | 92.0% | 90.0% | 26.0% | 96.0% | |
| PVRINOX | 91.0% | 73.0% | 86.0% | 70.0% | |
| SANDESH | 90.0% | 96.0% | 70.0% | 33.0% | |
| DBCORP | 88.0% | 93.0% | 78.0% | 24.0% |
Factor Interactions
Cheap for a Reason?
Looks cheap (93th value) but weak quality (7th). Classic value trap risk.
Falling Knife
Weak momentum (17th) despite looking cheap (93th value). Wait for momentum to stabilise.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (65%) significantly exceeds 252-day (30%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
B
71.2% avg (7 factors)
Quality
D
40.9% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
F
8.3% avg (4 factors)
Risk
B
66.1% avg (1 factors)
Deep value territory, but quality is concerning. This is either a turnaround opportunity or a value trap — the F-Score and accruals ratio will be key differentiators. Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.580 | —0 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.930 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.070 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.170 | —1 | — | |
| F-Score | 4.000 | —1 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.909 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.303 | —0 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
6.77
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.1476
Price / Sales
1.33
Price / Book
0.35
FCF Yield
-4.4%
EBITDA / EV
25.0%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.7511
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
0.0%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
5.1%
Return on Assets
4.5%
Net Margin
19.7%
Operating Margin
-1.7%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
8.6%
Current Ratio
8.36
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.049
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-12.5%
12M Return
-25.1%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-24.3%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-0.80
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-3.1%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-17.1%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.235
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
4
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
7
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
9
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
11
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
66
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity