Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/829cb6b8-ec52-49b7-83db-7759be17808f/
RM
Roxmore Resources Inc.Snapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
1 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
Noneyr
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
42.0%ile
P/B
3.3×
FCF Yield
-0.083
SH Yield
-0.220
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
59.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
59.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
59.00000000
/100
Negative FCF yield (-8.3%) — the business is currently cash-consumptive.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
42.0%ile
ROE
-0.192
ROA
-0.172
GPA
-0.006
Current
9.65
F-Score
1/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Stability
0.282
lower=better
Accruals
-0.085
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
F-Score of 1/9 flags fundamental deterioration — multiple signals are weakening.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
43.0%ile
Vol 252d
106.5%
Vol 60d
116.7%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-36.2%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.36
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Financial Services
· 82 peers
Sector Value %ile
25.3%
Sector Quality %ile
43.4%
P/B z-score
0.35
Sector Avg OS
59.0%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
F
21.1% avg (3 factors)
Quality
D
38.8% avg (5 factors)
Risk
F
0.0% avg (1 factors)
Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.360 | —0 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.420 | —0 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.420 | —0 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.430 | —0 | — | |
| F-Score | 1.000 | —1 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.576 | —0 | — | |
| Volatility | 1.065 | —1 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
Price / Book
3.25
FCF Yield
-8.3%
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
-22.0%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
-19.2%
Return on Assets
-17.2%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
-0.6%
Current Ratio
9.65
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.085
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.282
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
1
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
-22.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
59
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
59
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
59
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity