Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/a16d026d-c680-4bdf-b52f-dcf64f139b17/
JAINREC
JAIN RESOURCE RECYCLING LSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
0 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
19.0%ile
P/E
39.1×
P/S
1.3×
P/B
7.6×
E/P
0.0256
FCF Yield
-0.054
EBITDA/EV
0.039
SH Yield
-0.042
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
74.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
81.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
81.00000000
/100
P/E of 39.1x is premium-priced — the market is paying up for expected growth. Negative FCF yield (-5.4%) — the business is currently cash-consumptive. VC2 score of 81.00000000/100 — expensive across all six composite measures.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
16.0%ile
ROE
0.194
ROA
0.090
Net Margin
0.032
Op Margin
0.050
GPA
0.211
Current
1.80
F-Score
4/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.484
Earn Growth
0.588
Accruals
0.268
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
Accruals ratio of 0.268 is elevated — earnings quality may be lower than headline numbers suggest.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
51.0%ile
6M Return
-6.2%
Vol 252d
67.9%
Vol 60d
149.4%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-39.8%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (149%) is expanding vs long-term (68%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.09
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Basic Materials
· 368 peers
Sector Value %ile
14.4%
Sector Quality %ile
18.4%
P/E z-score
-0.10
P/B z-score
1.11
Sector Avg OS
54.3%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
| Symbol | Name | OS | Value | Quality | Momentum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JAYNECOIND | 99.0% | 84.0% | 98.0% | 98.0% | |
| SAIL | 99.0% | 93.0% | 85.0% | 92.0% | |
| ARIES | 99.0% | 97.0% | 96.0% | 77.0% | |
| GULPOLY | 99.0% | 96.0% | 94.0% | 75.0% | |
| SANDUMA | 98.0% | 82.0% | 98.0% | 93.0% | |
| ANDHRSUGAR | 98.0% | 98.0% | 76.0% | 81.0% | |
| MANAKSTEEL | 98.0% | 96.0% | 72.0% | 78.0% | |
| NATIONALUM | 98.0% | 80.0% | 97.0% | 98.0% |
Factor Interactions
Earnings Quality Concern
ROE looks strong (19%) but high accruals (0.268) suggests earnings are accrual-heavy, not cash-backed.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (149%) significantly exceeds 252-day (68%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
F
22.8% avg (7 factors)
Quality
D
35.8% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
F
29.7% avg (1 factors)
Risk
F
3.6% avg (1 factors)
Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.090 | —1 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.190 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.160 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.510 | —0 | — | |
| F-Score | 4.000 | —1 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.818 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.679 | —1 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
39.12
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0256
Price / Sales
1.26
Price / Book
7.60
FCF Yield
-5.4%
EBITDA / EV
3.9%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.7204
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
-4.2%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
19.4%
Return on Assets
9.0%
Net Margin
3.2%
Operating Margin
5.0%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
21.1%
Current Ratio
1.80
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.268
External Financing
Net issuance — lower=better
0.593
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-6.2%
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
48.4%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
58.8%
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
4
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
-4.2%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
74
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
81
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
81
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity