Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/b708808e-1936-4d92-b4a0-f17ba683ea7d/
BEL
Bharat Electronics LimitedSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
2 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
Noneyr
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
Vol 25%
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
6.0%ile
P/E
43.2×
P/S
9.6×
P/B
12.4×
E/P
0.0231
FCF Yield
0.002
EBITDA/EV
0.033
SH Yield
0.000
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
96.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
95.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
96.00000000
/100
P/E of 43.2x is premium-priced — the market is paying up for expected growth. VC2 score of 95.00000000/100 — expensive across all six composite measures.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
86.0%ile
ROE
0.288
ROA
0.155
Net Margin
0.223
Op Margin
0.278
GPA
0.337
Current
1.98
F-Score
7/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.162
Earn Growth
0.139
Stability
0.325
lower=better
Accruals
0.120
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
ROE of 29% is exceptional. Accruals ratio of 0.120 is elevated — earnings quality may be lower than headline numbers suggest.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
77.0%ile
6M Return
0.7%
12M Return
5.2%
12-1 Mom
13.3%
Risk-Adj
0.54
Vol 252d
24.6%
Vol 60d
54.2%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-13.6%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (54%) is expanding vs long-term (25%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.36
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Industrials
· 468 peers
Sector Value %ile
11.3%
Sector Quality %ile
89.8%
P/E z-score
-0.08
P/B z-score
0.45
Sector Avg OS
44.8%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
| Symbol | Name | OS | Value | Quality | Momentum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GESHIP | 99.0% | 93.0% | 90.0% | 94.0% | |
| CORDSCABLE | 98.0% | 96.0% | 72.0% | 79.0% | |
| SAHYADRI | 98.0% | 99.0% | 87.0% | 67.0% | |
| MAHESHWARI | 97.0% | 97.0% | 62.0% | 76.0% | |
| UNIPARTS | 97.0% | 73.0% | 95.0% | 96.0% | |
| NELCAST | 97.0% | 84.0% | 86.0% | 79.0% | |
| SOMANYCERA | 96.0% | 82.0% | 89.0% | 77.0% | |
| NAVA | 96.0% | 80.0% | 85.0% | 85.0% |
Factor Interactions
Quality Momentum — Expensive
Strong quality (86th) and momentum (77th) but expensive (6th value). Premium priced — watch for mean reversion.
Earnings Quality Concern
ROE looks strong (29%) but high accruals (0.120) suggests earnings are accrual-heavy, not cash-backed.
Quality at a Premium
High quality (86th) but expensive (6th value). Upside may be limited without earnings growth.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (54%) significantly exceeds 252-day (25%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
F
15.7% avg (7 factors)
Quality
B
69.0% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
D
41.8% avg (4 factors)
Risk
A
75.7% avg (1 factors)
High quality business commanding a premium price. The market recognises the quality — returns from here depend on continued fundamental execution. Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.360 | —0 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.060 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.860 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.770 | —1 | — | |
| F-Score | 7.000 | —1 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.939 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.246 | —0 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
43.24
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0231
Price / Sales
9.64
Price / Book
12.44
Price / Cash Flow
193.58
FCF Yield
0.2%
EBITDA / EV
3.3%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.1044
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
0.0%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
28.8%
Return on Assets
15.5%
Net Margin
22.3%
Operating Margin
27.8%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
33.7%
Current Ratio
1.98
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.120
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
0.7%
12M Return
5.2%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
13.3%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
0.54
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
16.2%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
13.9%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.325
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
7
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
96
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
95
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
96
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity