Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/c9307a21-a92b-4ff8-a619-2d5bcfb6700a/
CENTURYPLY
Century Plyboards (India) LimitedSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
1 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
Noneyr
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
11.0%ile
P/E
64.7×
P/S
3.2×
P/B
6.5×
E/P
0.0154
FCF Yield
0.002
EBITDA/EV
0.035
SH Yield
0.001
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
88.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
85.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
86.00000000
/100
P/E of 64.7x is premium-priced — the market is paying up for expected growth. VC2 score of 85.00000000/100 — expensive across all six composite measures.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
79.0%ile
ROE
0.101
ROA
0.051
Net Margin
0.049
Op Margin
0.087
GPA
0.514
Current
1.05
F-Score
8/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.192
Earn Growth
0.418
Stability
0.177
lower=better
Accruals
-0.038
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
F-Score of 8/9 indicates strong fundamental improvement across multiple dimensions.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
70.0%ile
6M Return
-4.5%
12M Return
-2.9%
12-1 Mom
0.9%
Risk-Adj
0.03
Vol 252d
26.1%
Vol 60d
58.4%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-22.9%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (58%) is expanding vs long-term (26%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.34
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Basic Materials
· 368 peers
Sector Value %ile
7.6%
Sector Quality %ile
82.7%
P/E z-score
-0.03
P/B z-score
0.84
Sector Avg OS
54.3%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
| Symbol | Name | OS | Value | Quality | Momentum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JAYNECOIND | 99.0% | 84.0% | 98.0% | 98.0% | |
| GULPOLY | 99.0% | 96.0% | 94.0% | 75.0% | |
| ARIES | 99.0% | 97.0% | 96.0% | 77.0% | |
| SAIL | 99.0% | 93.0% | 85.0% | 92.0% | |
| SANDUMA | 98.0% | 82.0% | 98.0% | 93.0% | |
| TATASTEEL | 98.0% | 81.0% | 91.0% | 89.0% | |
| ANDHRSUGAR | 98.0% | 98.0% | 76.0% | 81.0% | |
| MANAKSTEEL | 98.0% | 96.0% | 72.0% | 78.0% |
Factor Interactions
Quality Momentum — Expensive
Strong quality (79th) and momentum (70th) but expensive (11th value). Premium priced — watch for mean reversion.
Quality at a Premium
High quality (79th) but expensive (11th value). Upside may be limited without earnings growth.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (58%) significantly exceeds 252-day (26%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
F
22.4% avg (7 factors)
Quality
C
46.2% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
D
30.6% avg (4 factors)
Risk
B
73.2% avg (1 factors)
Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.340 | —0 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.110 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.790 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.700 | —1 | — | |
| F-Score | 8.000 | —1 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.939 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.261 | —0 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
64.75
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0154
Price / Sales
3.15
Price / Book
6.52
Price / Cash Flow
37.21
FCF Yield
0.2%
EBITDA / EV
3.5%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.2880
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
0.1%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
10.1%
Return on Assets
5.1%
Net Margin
4.9%
Operating Margin
8.7%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
51.4%
Current Ratio
1.05
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.038
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-4.5%
12M Return
-2.9%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
0.9%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
0.03
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
19.2%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
41.8%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.177
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
8
Dividend Yield
0.1%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
88
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
85
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
86
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity