Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/dbabc0aa-85b8-4244-ab2f-6a55f41374e7/
EMMVEE
EMMVEE PHOTOVOLTAIC PWR LSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
2 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
Noneyr
🌱
GARP
Rev +116%
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
25.0%ile
P/E
21.4×
P/S
4.6×
P/B
6.3×
E/P
0.0467
FCF Yield
-0.019
EBITDA/EV
0.077
SH Yield
-0.089
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
78.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
85.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
83.00000000
/100
Negative FCF yield (-1.9%) — the business is currently cash-consumptive. VC2 score of 85.00000000/100 — expensive across all six composite measures.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
79.0%ile
ROE
0.293
ROA
0.187
Net Margin
0.214
Op Margin
0.286
GPA
0.393
Current
2.06
F-Score
8/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
1.162
Earn Growth
1.931
Stability
0.313
lower=better
Accruals
0.153
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
ROE of 29% is exceptional. Accruals ratio of 0.153 is elevated — earnings quality may be lower than headline numbers suggest. F-Score of 8/9 indicates strong fundamental improvement across multiple dimensions.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
55.0%ile
6M Return
57.2%
Vol 252d
52.9%
Vol 60d
61.0%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-21.0%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.42
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Technology
· 181 peers
Sector Value %ile
32.4%
Sector Quality %ile
75.8%
P/E z-score
-0.24
P/B z-score
-0.04
Sector Avg OS
44.0%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
| Symbol | Name | OS | Value | Quality | Momentum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAAREEINDO | 96.0% | 78.0% | 89.0% | 86.0% | |
| RPSGVENT | 95.0% | 92.0% | 61.0% | 75.0% | |
| INFOBEAN | 94.0% | 65.0% | 91.0% | 96.0% | |
| DATAMATICS | 94.0% | 67.0% | 91.0% | 90.0% | |
| GTLINFRA | 94.0% | 87.0% | 66.0% | 73.0% | |
| SIGMA | 93.0% | 67.0% | 95.0% | 81.0% | |
| IVALUE | 92.0% | 92.0% | 69.0% | 51.0% | |
| ONWARDTEC | 92.0% | 91.0% | 85.0% | 36.0% |
Factor Interactions
Earnings Quality Concern
ROE looks strong (29%) but high accruals (0.153) suggests earnings are accrual-heavy, not cash-backed.
Quality at a Premium
High quality (79th) but expensive (25th value). Upside may be limited without earnings growth.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
D
32.5% avg (7 factors)
Quality
B
71.8% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
A
100.0% avg (1 factors)
Risk
F
28.5% avg (1 factors)
High quality business commanding a premium price. The market recognises the quality — returns from here depend on continued fundamental execution. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.420 | —0 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.250 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.790 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.550 | —0 | — | |
| F-Score | 8.000 | —1 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.879 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.529 | —1 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
21.40
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0467
Price / Sales
4.59
Price / Book
6.26
Price / Cash Flow
115.66
FCF Yield
-1.9%
EBITDA / EV
7.7%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.2168
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
-8.9%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
29.3%
Return on Assets
18.7%
Net Margin
21.4%
Operating Margin
28.6%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
39.3%
Current Ratio
2.06
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.153
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
57.2%
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
116.2%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
193.1%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.313
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
8
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
-8.9%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
78
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
85
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
83
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity