MEXA  โ€ข  NASDAQ  โ€ข  BULL US equities ยท completed weekly research
MEXA
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ NASDAQ ยท Technology ยท Software - Application

BULL beta and relative strength

Webull Corp

BULL is recovering from below benchmark with very high sensitivity to QQQ.

Week ending Latest completed weekly edition
Next update 15:40 UK ยท after Stage Analysis
One-year beta 1.82Very high sensitivity ยท Falling
Movement explained 28%53% weekly correlation
Relative strength-5.38Recovering from below benchmark
Downside beta 0.67Upside beta 3.27
One-year excess return-68.2%-43.0% stock ยท 25.2% benchmark
Directional participation

BULL in rising and falling QQQ weeks

These percentages count what actually happened in completed weeks. They describe historical participation, not certainty about the next move.

Latest 52-week reading Directional participation is mixed

The stock sometimes follows the benchmark, but neither direction has been consistently dependable.

68% of directional weeks moved the same way.
When QQQ rose55%

BULL also rose in 55% of 29 rising benchmark weeks.

When QQQ fell78%

BULL also fell in 78% of 23 falling benchmark weeks.

Market state now Range-bound market with active movement
-0.5% over 13 weeks21.8% volatility

After 9 earlier matches by market direction, usually moves with the benchmark both ways.

Joined rising weeks80%
Joined falling weeks100%
Limited sample ยท 89% same-direction rate ยท 4.13 beta
Benchmark fit

BULL sensitivity to QQQ

The benchmark relationship is partial and explains 28% of weekly movement over the latest year. Current beta is 1.82 and is falling.

Likely beta range1.01 to 2.63

A wider range means the beta estimate is less precise.

Beta stability22/100

How consistently rolling beta has held its level and direction.

Annualised alpha-81.1%

The weekly regression intercept annualised; it is historical, not expected return.

Tracking error55.7%

Annualised volatility of returns above or below the benchmark.

Relationship directionRelationship broadly stable

-0.2 point change in movement explained across two distinct 26-week windows.

Beta and benchmark fitBeta is useful with context
Weaker benchmark fitStronger benchmark fitLower sensitivityHigher sensitivity

The estimate carries information, but direction, stability or the likely range should be checked before relying on it.

Historical one-week sensitivity
If QQQ rises 1%+3.27%historically associated BULL move
If QQQ falls 1%-0.67%historically associated BULL move
Likely beta range 1.01 to 2.63 ยท width 1.62
Can the beta be trusted?Partial relationship
Movement explained28%
Stability22%
Directional agreement68%

Rolling beta

26-week estimates show whether market sensitivity is rising or falling.

Move across the chart to inspect a completed week.
Rolling betaMarket-like beta 1.00

Rolling relationship strength

Correlation shows direction; explained movement shows how useful the relationship has been.

Move across the chart to inspect a completed week.
CorrelationMovement explained
PeriodBetaCorrelationMovement explainedAlphaExcess returnTracking error
6 months1.6553%28%+43.6%+31.2%59.2%
1 year1.8253%28%-81.1%-68.2%55.7%
Relative strength

BULL relative strength against QQQ

The score compares the stock/benchmark ratio with its trailing 52-week average. Above zero means the ratio is above trend; direction shows whether that advantage is building or fading.

Relative-strength trend

Current score -5.38 ยท 13-week change +42.58

Move across the chart to inspect a completed week.
Relative strengthZero baseline

Stock, benchmark and worthwhile peers

Each path starts at 100. Sector and industry appear only when their Market Structure indexes have enough constituents.

Move across the chart to inspect a completed week.
Sector ยท Technology+46.5 points

versus sector over 13 weeks ยท 707 constituents ยท 57% correlation

Industry ยท Software - Application+35.0 points

versus industry over 13 weeks ยท 199 constituents ยท 51% correlation

Sensitivity to Technology1.54 beta

32% of weekly movement explained by the sector over one year.

Sensitivity to Software - Application1.21 beta

26% of weekly movement explained by the industry over one year.

Return components

13-week and 52-week returns relative to QQQ

This is a return bridge, not a claim of cause. It starts with the benchmark return, then shows the difference added at sector, industry and ticker level.

Last 13 weeks+42.5 points vs benchmark
Broad market-0.5%
Sector difference-4.0%
Industry difference+11.5%
Ticker difference+35.0%

The largest source of relative strength was the ticker difference. BULL returned 42.1%; QQQ returned -0.5%.

Last 52 weeks-68.2 points vs benchmark
Broad market+25.2%
Sector difference-25.8%
Industry difference-24.0%
Ticker difference-18.4%

The largest source of relative weakness was the sector difference. BULL returned -43.0%; QQQ returned 25.2%.

Market conditions

BULL in rising and falling benchmark weeks

Upside beta is higher than downside beta, a historically favourable split.

Upside beta3.2794% upside capture
Downside beta0.67236% downside capture
Current splitMore responsive in rising markets+2.60 beta gap
ConditionWeeksBULL averageQQQ averageBetaBeat benchmark
Benchmark up29+2.16%+2.29%3.2748%
Benchmark down23-4.33%-1.84%0.6730%
Strongest benchmark weeks10+8.00%+4.05%3.1050%
Weakest benchmark weeks10-5.86%-3.12%0.4630%
Quieter benchmark weeks26-2.28%+0.23%0.7338%
Historical extremes

Strongest and weakest 13-week relative periods

Distinct 13-week windows prevent one long move from filling the list with overlapping dates.

Strongest relative periods

2026-05-29 to 2026-08-21+42.5 pts

BULL 42.1% ยท QQQ -0.5%

The return pattern shows that the industry added to the move, and the ticker moved beyond its peer backdrop.
2025-07-04 to 2025-09-26+31.1 pts

BULL 40.0% ยท QQQ 8.9%

The return pattern shows that the ticker moved beyond its peer backdrop.
2026-02-20 to 2026-05-15+-0.3 pts

BULL 17.5% ยท QQQ 17.8%

The return pattern shows that the sector moved the same way, and the industry added to the move.

Weakest relative periods

2025-04-25 to 2025-07-18-62.4 pts

BULL -35.9% ยท QQQ 26.5%

The return pattern shows that the industry added to the move, and the ticker moved beyond its peer backdrop.
2025-08-22 to 2025-11-14-51.7 pts

BULL -46.1% ยท QQQ 5.6%

The return pattern shows that the sector moved the same way, and the industry added to the move, and the ticker moved beyond its peer backdrop.
2026-01-16 to 2026-04-10-39.4 pts

BULL -41.7% ยท QQQ -2.4%

The return pattern shows that the sector moved the same way, and the industry added to the move, and the ticker moved beyond its peer backdrop.
Pressure and timing

Drawdowns and lead/lag relationship

The strongest link is in the same week. Lead/lag evidence is treated as secondary because timing relationships can change quickly.

Drawdown from each rolling high

Worst available drawdown: BULL -81.7% ยท QQQ -10.3%

Move across the chart to inspect a completed week.
BULL drawdownQQQ drawdown
Ticker leads 2w
-2%
Ticker leads 1w
19%
Same week
3%
Benchmark leads 1w
16%
Benchmark leads 2w
1%
Observable signals

Signals that would confirm or change the reading

These are conditions to monitor, not price targets or forecasts.

Relative strengthBelow the zero baseline

A sustained move above zero would mark a meaningful repair in the stock/benchmark ratio.

Up/down beta+2.60 upside-minus-downside gap

Upside beta is higher than downside beta. The favourable split remains intact while that gap stays positive.

Exposure trendBeta is falling

Rising beta means broad-market moves are carrying more weight; falling beta means ticker-specific forces are carrying more weight.

Peer confirmation+35.0 points versus Software - Application over 13 weeks

Strength shared by the peer group is broader; strength confined to the ticker is more company-specific and usually less stable.

Method and limits

Data and interpretation limits

Data
Completed weekly observations from 2025-04-18 to 2026-08-21 ยท 71 aligned weeks.
Current reading
52 weeks; rolling charts use 26 weeks.
Relative strength
Stock/benchmark ratio compared with its trailing 52-week average.
Peer evidence
At least 10 sector constituents and 5 industry constituents. Thin groups are excluded.
Boundary
Historical relationship analysis, not a forecast or a statement of cause. Historical relationships can break without warning.

Evidence context