MEXA  โ€ข  NYSE  โ€ข  VIK US equities ยท completed weekly research
MEXA
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ NYSE ยท Consumer Cyclical ยท Travel Services

VIK beta and relative strength

Viking Holdings Ltd

VIK is weakening, but still above benchmark with market-like sensitivity to SPY.

Week ending Latest completed weekly edition
Next update 15:40 UK ยท after Stage Analysis
One-year beta 1.04Market-like sensitivity ยท Falling
Movement explained 16%41% weekly correlation
Relative strength+10.04Weakening, but still above benchmark
Downside beta 1.13Upside beta 1.40
One-year excess return+33.7%53.7% stock ยท 20.0% benchmark
Directional participation

VIK in rising and falling SPY weeks

These percentages count what actually happened in completed weeks. They describe historical participation, not certainty about the next move.

Latest 52-week reading Usually moves with the benchmark both ways

Rising and falling benchmark weeks have both produced consistent directional participation.

69% of directional weeks moved the same way.
When SPY rose71%

VIK also rose in 71% of 31 rising benchmark weeks.

When SPY fell67%

VIK also fell in 67% of 21 falling benchmark weeks.

Market state now Range-bound market with normal movement
+3.0% over 13 weeks12.5% volatility

After 20 earlier matches by market direction, usually moves with the benchmark both ways.

Joined rising weeks77%
Joined falling weeks71%
Limited sample ยท 75% same-direction rate ยท 1.96 beta
Benchmark fit

VIK sensitivity to SPY

The benchmark relationship is partial and explains 16% of weekly movement over the latest year. Current beta is 1.04 and is falling.

Likely beta range0.39 to 1.68

A wider range means the beta estimate is less precise.

Beta stability70/100

How consistently rolling beta has held its level and direction.

Annualised alpha+28.3%

The weekly regression intercept annualised; it is historical, not expected return.

Tracking error28.5%

Annualised volatility of returns above or below the benchmark.

Relationship directionRelationship forming

+18.7 point change in movement explained across two distinct 26-week windows.

Beta and benchmark fitBeta is useful with context
Weaker benchmark fitStronger benchmark fitLower sensitivityHigher sensitivity

The estimate carries information, but direction, stability or the likely range should be checked before relying on it.

Historical one-week sensitivity
If SPY rises 1%+1.40%historically associated VIK move
If SPY falls 1%-1.13%historically associated VIK move
Likely beta range 0.39 to 1.68 ยท width 1.29
Can the beta be trusted?Partial relationship
Movement explained16%
Stability70%
Directional agreement69%

Rolling beta

26-week estimates show whether market sensitivity is rising or falling.

Move across the chart to inspect a completed week.
Rolling betaMarket-like beta 1.00

Rolling relationship strength

Correlation shows direction; explained movement shows how useful the relationship has been.

Move across the chart to inspect a completed week.
CorrelationMovement explained
PeriodBetaCorrelationMovement explainedAlphaExcess returnTracking error
6 months1.2449%24%+10.6%+6.1%31.9%
1 year1.0441%16%+28.3%+33.7%28.5%
2 years1.3159%35%+30.6%+121.0%28.2%
Relative strength

VIK relative strength against SPY

The score compares the stock/benchmark ratio with its trailing 52-week average. Above zero means the ratio is above trend; direction shows whether that advantage is building or fading.

Relative-strength trend

Current score 10.04 ยท 13-week change -3.68

Move across the chart to inspect a completed week.
Relative strengthZero baseline

Stock, benchmark and worthwhile peers

Each path starts at 100. Sector and industry appear only when their Market Structure indexes have enough constituents.

Move across the chart to inspect a completed week.
Sector ยท Consumer Cyclical+6.6 points

versus sector over 13 weeks ยท 494 constituents ยท 48% correlation

Industry ยท Travel Services-0.2 points

versus industry over 13 weeks ยท 17 constituents ยท 62% correlation

Sensitivity to Consumer Cyclical0.80 beta

23% of weekly movement explained by the sector over one year.

Sensitivity to Travel Services0.83 beta

39% of weekly movement explained by the industry over one year.

Return components

13-week and 52-week returns relative to SPY

This is a return bridge, not a claim of cause. It starts with the benchmark return, then shows the difference added at sector, industry and ticker level.

Last 13 weeks+7.2 points vs benchmark
Broad market+3.0%
Sector difference+0.6%
Industry difference+6.8%
Ticker difference-0.2%

The largest source of relative strength was the industry difference. VIK returned 10.2%; SPY returned 3.0%.

Last 52 weeks+33.7 points vs benchmark
Broad market+20.0%
Sector difference-27.0%
Industry difference+1.4%
Ticker difference+59.2%

The largest source of relative strength was the ticker difference. VIK returned 53.7%; SPY returned 20.0%.

Market conditions

VIK in rising and falling benchmark weeks

Upside beta is higher than downside beta, a historically favourable split.

Upside beta1.40127% upside capture
Downside beta1.1338% downside capture
Current splitMore responsive in rising markets+0.27 beta gap
ConditionWeeksVIK averageSPY averageBetaBeat benchmark
Benchmark up31+1.87%+1.47%1.4048%
Benchmark down21-0.47%-1.26%1.1348%
Strongest benchmark weeks10+3.17%+2.85%3.0740%
Weakest benchmark weeks10-1.03%-1.99%-1.8960%
Quieter benchmark weeks26+0.98%+0.28%0.4654%
Historical extremes

Strongest and weakest 13-week relative periods

Distinct 13-week windows prevent one long move from filling the list with overlapping dates.

Strongest relative periods

2026-04-03 to 2026-06-26+35.3 pts

VIK 50.6% ยท SPY 15.3%

The return pattern shows that the industry added to the move, and the ticker moved beyond its peer backdrop.
2025-04-11 to 2025-07-04+34.6 pts

VIK 58.8% ยท SPY 24.1%

The return pattern shows that the industry added to the move, and the ticker moved beyond its peer backdrop.
2024-09-20 to 2024-12-13+31.4 pts

VIK 39.2% ยท SPY 7.8%

The return pattern shows that the industry added to the move, and the ticker moved beyond its peer backdrop.

Weakest relative periods

2025-02-14 to 2025-05-09-12.3 pts

VIK -18.0% ยท SPY -5.8%

The return pattern shows that the sector moved the same way, and the industry added to the move.
2025-08-22 to 2025-11-14-7.0 pts

VIK -2.3% ยท SPY 4.7%

The return pattern shows that the sector moved the same way.
2025-12-26 to 2026-03-20-2.8 pts

VIK -7.2% ยท SPY -4.4%

The return pattern shows that the sector moved the same way, and the industry added to the move.
Pressure and timing

Drawdowns and lead/lag relationship

The strongest link is in the same week. Lead/lag evidence is treated as secondary because timing relationships can change quickly.

Drawdown from each rolling high

Worst available drawdown: VIK -33.8% ยท SPY -16.9%

Move across the chart to inspect a completed week.
VIK drawdownSPY drawdown
Ticker leads 2w
12%
Ticker leads 1w
10%
Same week
55%
Benchmark leads 1w
-10%
Benchmark leads 2w
-6%
Observable signals

Signals that would confirm or change the reading

These are conditions to monitor, not price targets or forecasts.

Relative strengthAbove the zero baseline

A fall through zero would show that the stock/benchmark ratio has moved below its trailing one-year average.

Up/down beta+0.27 upside-minus-downside gap

Upside beta is higher than downside beta. The favourable split remains intact while that gap stays positive.

Exposure trendBeta is falling

Rising beta means broad-market moves are carrying more weight; falling beta means ticker-specific forces are carrying more weight.

Peer confirmation-0.2 points versus Travel Services over 13 weeks

Strength shared by the peer group is broader; strength confined to the ticker is more company-specific and usually less stable.

Method and limits

Data and interpretation limits

Data
Completed weekly observations from 2024-05-10 to 2026-08-21 ยท 120 aligned weeks.
Current reading
52 weeks; rolling charts use 26 weeks.
Relative strength
Stock/benchmark ratio compared with its trailing 52-week average.
Peer evidence
At least 10 sector constituents and 5 industry constituents. Thin groups are excluded.
Boundary
Historical relationship analysis, not a forecast or a statement of cause. Historical relationships can break without warning.

Evidence context