MEXA  โ€ข  NASDAQ  โ€ข  STX US equities ยท completed weekly research
MEXA
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ NASDAQ ยท Technology ยท Computer Hardware

STX beta and relative strength

Seagate Technology PLC

STX is weakening, but still above benchmark with very high sensitivity to QQQ.

Week ending Latest completed weekly edition
Next update 15:40 UK ยท after Stage Analysis
One-year beta 2.01Very high sensitivity ยท Rising
Movement explained 30%54% weekly correlation
Relative strength+58.61Weakening, but still above benchmark
Downside beta 3.21Upside beta 0.96
One-year excess return+412.7%437.9% stock ยท 25.2% benchmark
Directional participation

STX in rising and falling QQQ weeks

These percentages count what actually happened in completed weeks. They describe historical participation, not certainty about the next move.

Latest 52-week reading More dependable when the benchmark rises

The stock has joined rising benchmark weeks more consistently than falling ones.

71% of directional weeks moved the same way.
When QQQ rose86%

STX also rose in 86% of 29 rising benchmark weeks.

When QQQ fell52%

STX also fell in 52% of 23 falling benchmark weeks.

Market state now Range-bound market with active movement
-0.5% over 13 weeks21.8% volatility

After 17 earlier matches by direction and movement level, more dependable when the benchmark rises.

Joined rising weeks85%
Joined falling weeks25%
Limited sample ยท 71% same-direction rate ยท 0.83 beta
Benchmark fit

STX sensitivity to QQQ

The benchmark relationship is partial and explains 30% of weekly movement over the latest year. Current beta is 2.01 and is rising.

Likely beta range1.15 to 2.87

A wider range means the beta estimate is less precise.

Beta stability80/100

How consistently rolling beta has held its level and direction.

Annualised alpha+144.9%

The weekly regression intercept annualised; it is historical, not expected return.

Tracking error59.5%

Annualised volatility of returns above or below the benchmark.

Relationship directionRelationship strengthening

+13.9 point change in movement explained across two distinct 26-week windows.

Beta and benchmark fitBeta is useful with context
Weaker benchmark fitStronger benchmark fitLower sensitivityHigher sensitivity

The estimate carries information, but direction, stability or the likely range should be checked before relying on it.

Historical one-week sensitivity
If QQQ rises 1%+0.96%historically associated STX move
If QQQ falls 1%-3.21%historically associated STX move
Likely beta range 1.15 to 2.87 ยท width 1.72
Can the beta be trusted?Partial relationship
Movement explained30%
Stability80%
Directional agreement71%

Rolling beta

26-week estimates show whether market sensitivity is rising or falling.

Move across the chart to inspect a completed week.
Rolling betaMarket-like beta 1.00

Rolling relationship strength

Correlation shows direction; explained movement shows how useful the relationship has been.

Move across the chart to inspect a completed week.
CorrelationMovement explained
PeriodBetaCorrelationMovement explainedAlphaExcess returnTracking error
6 months2.0959%35%+105.0%+89.8%66.6%
1 year2.0154%30%+144.9%+412.7%59.5%
2 years1.6257%33%+88.3%+692.9%49.6%
3 years1.4956%32%+65.2%+1214.3%43.6%
5 years1.2757%33%+40.4%+947.1%39.9%
Relative strength

STX relative strength against QQQ

The score compares the stock/benchmark ratio with its trailing 52-week average. Above zero means the ratio is above trend; direction shows whether that advantage is building or fading.

Relative-strength trend

Current score 58.61 ยท 13-week change -65.14

Move across the chart to inspect a completed week.
Relative strengthZero baseline

Stock, benchmark and worthwhile peers

Each path starts at 100. Sector and industry appear only when their Market Structure indexes have enough constituents.

Move across the chart to inspect a completed week.
Sector ยท Technology+9.1 points

versus sector over 13 weeks ยท 707 constituents ยท 36% correlation

Industry ยท Computer Hardware+9.0 points

versus industry over 13 weeks ยท 36 constituents ยท 55% correlation

Sensitivity to Technology1.06 beta

13% of weekly movement explained by the sector over one year.

Sensitivity to Computer Hardware1.00 beta

30% of weekly movement explained by the industry over one year.

Return components

13-week and 52-week returns relative to QQQ

This is a return bridge, not a claim of cause. It starts with the benchmark return, then shows the difference added at sector, industry and ticker level.

Last 13 weeks+5.1 points vs benchmark
Broad market-0.5%
Sector difference-4.0%
Industry difference0.0%
Ticker difference+9.0%

The largest source of relative strength was the ticker difference. STX returned 4.7%; QQQ returned -0.5%.

Last 52 weeks+412.7 points vs benchmark
Broad market+25.2%
Sector difference-25.8%
Industry difference+18.7%
Ticker difference+419.8%

The largest source of relative strength was the ticker difference. STX returned 437.9%; QQQ returned 25.2%.

Market conditions

STX in rising and falling benchmark weeks

Downside beta is higher than upside beta, so weak benchmark weeks have carried more sensitivity.

Upside beta0.96331% upside capture
Downside beta3.2163% downside capture
Current splitMore exposed in falling markets-2.25 beta gap
ConditionWeeksSTX averageQQQ averageBetaBeat benchmark
Benchmark up29+7.59%+2.29%0.9679%
Benchmark down23-1.16%-1.84%3.2157%
Strongest benchmark weeks10+9.63%+4.05%-0.5590%
Weakest benchmark weeks10-5.47%-3.12%3.9340%
Quieter benchmark weeks26+4.23%+0.23%2.4665%
Historical extremes

Strongest and weakest 13-week relative periods

Distinct 13-week windows prevent one long move from filling the list with overlapping dates.

Strongest relative periods

2026-03-27 to 2026-06-19+133.3 pts

STX 160.5% ยท QQQ 27.3%

The return pattern shows that the industry added to the move, and the ticker moved beyond its peer backdrop.
2025-04-11 to 2025-07-04+93.4 pts

STX 125.1% ยท QQQ 31.7%

The return pattern shows that the industry added to the move, and the ticker moved beyond its peer backdrop.
2025-08-15 to 2025-11-07+80.0 pts

STX 86.2% ยท QQQ 6.2%

The return pattern shows that the industry added to the move, and the ticker moved beyond its peer backdrop.

Weakest relative periods

2023-02-17 to 2023-05-12-26.9 pts

STX -18.3% ยท QQQ 8.6%

The return pattern shows that the sector moved the same way, and the ticker moved beyond its peer backdrop.
2024-10-04 to 2024-12-27-26.6 pts

STX -19.0% ยท QQQ 7.5%

The return pattern shows that the ticker moved beyond its peer backdrop.
2022-08-05 to 2022-10-28-24.2 pts

STX -34.9% ยท QQQ -10.7%

The return pattern shows that the industry added to the move, and the ticker moved beyond its peer backdrop.
Pressure and timing

Drawdowns and lead/lag relationship

The strongest link is in the same week. Lead/lag evidence is treated as secondary because timing relationships can change quickly.

Drawdown from each rolling high

Worst available drawdown: STX -53.4% ยท QQQ -35.1%

Move across the chart to inspect a completed week.
STX drawdownQQQ drawdown
Ticker leads 2w
1%
Ticker leads 1w
-4%
Same week
56%
Benchmark leads 1w
10%
Benchmark leads 2w
-6%
Observable signals

Signals that would confirm or change the reading

These are conditions to monitor, not price targets or forecasts.

Relative strengthAbove the zero baseline

A fall through zero would show that the stock/benchmark ratio has moved below its trailing one-year average.

Up/down beta-2.25 upside-minus-downside gap

Downside beta is higher than upside beta. A narrowing gap would be the first sign of better asymmetry.

Exposure trendBeta is rising

Rising beta means broad-market moves are carrying more weight; falling beta means ticker-specific forces are carrying more weight.

Peer confirmation+9.0 points versus Computer Hardware over 13 weeks

Strength shared by the peer group is broader; strength confined to the ticker is more company-specific and usually less stable.

Method and limits

Data and interpretation limits

Data
Completed weekly observations from 2020-09-04 to 2026-08-21 ยท 312 aligned weeks.
Current reading
52 weeks; rolling charts use 26 weeks.
Relative strength
Stock/benchmark ratio compared with its trailing 52-week average.
Peer evidence
At least 10 sector constituents and 5 industry constituents. Thin groups are excluded.
Boundary
Historical relationship analysis, not a forecast or a statement of cause. Historical relationships can break without warning.

Evidence context