EOG beta and relative strength
EOG Resources Inc
EOG is strengthening above benchmark with inverse to SPY.
EOG in rising and falling SPY weeks
These percentages count what actually happened in completed weeks. They describe historical participation, not certainty about the next move.
Neither rising nor falling benchmark weeks have produced dependable same-direction participation.
37% of directional weeks moved the same way.EOG also rose in 48% of 31 rising benchmark weeks.
EOG also fell in 19% of 21 falling benchmark weeks.
After 17 earlier matches by direction and movement level, directional participation is mixed.
EOG sensitivity to SPY
The benchmark relationship is partial and explains 28% of weekly movement over the latest year. Current beta is -1.29 and is falling.
A wider range means the beta estimate is less precise.
How consistently rolling beta has held its level and direction.
The weekly regression intercept annualised; it is historical, not expected return.
Annualised volatility of returns above or below the benchmark.
+57.2 point change in movement explained across two distinct 26-week windows.
The estimate carries information, but direction, stability or the likely range should be checked before relying on it.
Rolling beta
26-week estimates show whether market sensitivity is rising or falling.
Rolling relationship strength
Correlation shows direction; explained movement shows how useful the relationship has been.
EOG relative strength against SPY
The score compares the stock/benchmark ratio with its trailing 52-week average. Above zero means the ratio is above trend; direction shows whether that advantage is building or fading.
Relative-strength trend
Current score 13.18 ยท 13-week change +6.35
Stock, benchmark and worthwhile peers
Each path starts at 100. Sector and industry appear only when their Market Structure indexes have enough constituents.
versus sector over 13 weeks ยท 224 constituents ยท 77% correlation
versus industry over 13 weeks ยท 60 constituents ยท 85% correlation
60% of weekly movement explained by the sector over one year.
73% of weekly movement explained by the industry over one year.
13-week and 52-week returns relative to SPY
This is a return bridge, not a claim of cause. It starts with the benchmark return, then shows the difference added at sector, industry and ticker level.
The largest source of relative strength was the ticker difference. EOG returned 8.4%; SPY returned 3.0%.
The largest source of relative strength was the sector difference. EOG returned 29.8%; SPY returned 20.0%.
EOG in rising and falling benchmark weeks
Downside beta is higher than upside beta, so weak benchmark weeks have carried more sensitivity.
Strongest and weakest 13-week relative periods
Distinct 13-week windows prevent one long move from filling the list with overlapping dates.
Strongest relative periods
EOG 45.9% ยท SPY -7.9%
The return pattern shows that the sector moved the same way, and the industry added to the move, and the ticker moved beyond its peer backdrop.EOG 64.7% ยท SPY 11.2%
The return pattern shows that the sector moved the same way, and the industry added to the move.EOG 45.1% ยท SPY -3.5%
The return pattern shows that the sector moved the same way, and the industry added to the move.Weakest relative periods
EOG -15.6% ยท SPY 15.0%
The return pattern shows that the sector moved the same way, and the industry added to the move.EOG -20.8% ยท SPY 7.6%
The return pattern shows that the sector moved the same way, and the ticker moved beyond its peer backdrop.EOG -11.3% ยท SPY 15.3%
The return pattern shows that the sector moved the same way, and the industry added to the move.Drawdowns and lead/lag relationship
The strongest link is in the same week. Lead/lag evidence is treated as secondary because timing relationships can change quickly.
Drawdown from each rolling high
Worst available drawdown: EOG -31.0% ยท SPY -23.9%
Signals that would confirm or change the reading
These are conditions to monitor, not price targets or forecasts.
A fall through zero would show that the stock/benchmark ratio has moved below its trailing one-year average.
Downside beta is higher than upside beta. A narrowing gap would be the first sign of better asymmetry.
Rising beta means broad-market moves are carrying more weight; falling beta means ticker-specific forces are carrying more weight.
Strength shared by the peer group is broader; strength confined to the ticker is more company-specific and usually less stable.
Data and interpretation limits
- Data
- Completed weekly observations from 2020-09-04 to 2026-08-21 ยท 312 aligned weeks.
- Current reading
- 52 weeks; rolling charts use 26 weeks.
- Relative strength
- Stock/benchmark ratio compared with its trailing 52-week average.
- Peer evidence
- At least 10 sector constituents and 5 industry constituents. Thin groups are excluded.
- Boundary
- Historical relationship analysis, not a forecast or a statement of cause. Historical relationships can break without warning.