KRRO beta and relative strength
Korro Bio, Inc.
KRRO is recovering from below benchmark with very high sensitivity to QQQ.
KRRO in rising and falling QQQ weeks
These percentages count what actually happened in completed weeks. They describe historical participation, not certainty about the next move.
Rising and falling benchmark weeks have both produced consistent directional participation.
67% of directional weeks moved the same way.KRRO also rose in 66% of 29 rising benchmark weeks.
KRRO also fell in 70% of 23 falling benchmark weeks.
After 26 earlier matches by market direction, directional participation is mixed.
KRRO sensitivity to QQQ
The benchmark relationship is weak and explains 9% of weekly movement over the latest year. Current beta is 2.13 and is rising.
A wider range means the beta estimate is less precise.
How consistently rolling beta has held its level and direction.
The weekly regression intercept annualised; it is historical, not expected return.
Annualised volatility of returns above or below the benchmark.
+26.7 point change in movement explained across two distinct 26-week windows.
The benchmark fit is too weak for the headline beta to be treated as a dependable description on its own.
Rolling beta
26-week estimates show whether market sensitivity is rising or falling.
Rolling relationship strength
Correlation shows direction; explained movement shows how useful the relationship has been.
KRRO relative strength against QQQ
The score compares the stock/benchmark ratio with its trailing 52-week average. Above zero means the ratio is above trend; direction shows whether that advantage is building or fading.
Relative-strength trend
Current score -30.42 ยท 13-week change +13.32
Stock, benchmark and worthwhile peers
Each path starts at 100. Sector and industry appear only when their Market Structure indexes have enough constituents.
versus sector over 13 weeks ยท 948 constituents ยท 37% correlation
versus industry over 13 weeks ยท 529 constituents ยท 37% correlation
14% of weekly movement explained by the sector over one year.
14% of weekly movement explained by the industry over one year.
13-week and 52-week returns relative to QQQ
This is a return bridge, not a claim of cause. It starts with the benchmark return, then shows the difference added at sector, industry and ticker level.
The largest source of relative strength was the ticker difference. KRRO returned 13.5%; QQQ returned -0.5%.
The largest source of relative weakness was the ticker difference. KRRO returned -34.2%; QQQ returned 25.2%.
KRRO in rising and falling benchmark weeks
Downside beta is higher than upside beta, so weak benchmark weeks have carried more sensitivity.
Strongest and weakest 13-week relative periods
Distinct 13-week windows prevent one long move from filling the list with overlapping dates.
Strongest relative periods
KRRO 246.2% ยท QQQ 8.6%
The return pattern shows that the sector moved the same way, and the industry added to the move, and the ticker moved beyond its peer backdrop.KRRO 112.8% ยท QQQ -1.8%
The return pattern shows that the industry added to the move, and the ticker moved beyond its peer backdrop.KRRO 104.6% ยท QQQ 14.3%
The return pattern shows that the ticker moved beyond its peer backdrop.Weakest relative periods
KRRO -78.8% ยท QQQ 8.7%
The return pattern shows that the ticker moved beyond its peer backdrop.KRRO -62.4% ยท QQQ 8.1%
The return pattern shows that the sector moved the same way, and the industry added to the move, and the ticker moved beyond its peer backdrop.KRRO -53.8% ยท QQQ 5.7%
The return pattern shows that the sector moved the same way, and the industry added to the move, and the ticker moved beyond its peer backdrop.Drawdowns and lead/lag relationship
The strongest link is in the same week. Lead/lag evidence is treated as secondary because timing relationships can change quickly.
Drawdown from each rolling high
Worst available drawdown: KRRO -93.7% ยท QQQ -21.3%
Signals that would confirm or change the reading
These are conditions to monitor, not price targets or forecasts.
A sustained move above zero would mark a meaningful repair in the stock/benchmark ratio.
Downside beta is higher than upside beta. A narrowing gap would be the first sign of better asymmetry.
Rising beta means broad-market moves are carrying more weight; falling beta means ticker-specific forces are carrying more weight.
Strength shared by the peer group is broader; strength confined to the ticker is more company-specific and usually less stable.
Data and interpretation limits
- Data
- Completed weekly observations from 2023-11-17 to 2026-08-21 ยท 145 aligned weeks.
- Current reading
- 52 weeks; rolling charts use 26 weeks.
- Relative strength
- Stock/benchmark ratio compared with its trailing 52-week average.
- Peer evidence
- At least 10 sector constituents and 5 industry constituents. Thin groups are excluded.
- Boundary
- Historical relationship analysis, not a forecast or a statement of cause. Historical relationships can break without warning.