MEXA  โ€ข  NASDAQ  โ€ข  RILYG US equities ยท completed weekly research
MEXA
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ NASDAQ ยท Other ยท Other

RILYG beta and relative strength

B. Riley Financial Inc. 5.00% Senior Notes due 2026

RILYG is weakening, but still above benchmark with inverse to QQQ.

Week ending Latest completed weekly edition
Next update 15:40 UK ยท after Stage Analysis
One-year beta -0.02Inverse ยท Stable
Movement explained 0%-2% weekly correlation
Relative strength+2.62Weakening, but still above benchmark
Downside beta -0.12Upside beta -0.56
One-year excess return+5.8%31.0% stock ยท 25.2% benchmark
Directional participation

RILYG in rising and falling QQQ weeks

These percentages count what actually happened in completed weeks. They describe historical participation, not certainty about the next move.

Latest 52-week reading Directional participation is mixed

The stock sometimes follows the benchmark, but neither direction has been consistently dependable.

63% of directional weeks moved the same way.
When QQQ rose66%

RILYG also rose in 66% of 29 rising benchmark weeks.

When QQQ fell61%

RILYG also fell in 61% of 23 falling benchmark weeks.

Market state now Range-bound market with active movement
-0.5% over 13 weeks21.8% volatility

After 16 earlier matches by direction and movement level, directional participation is mixed.

Joined rising weeks58%
Joined falling weeks50%
Limited sample ยท 56% same-direction rate ยท -0.04 beta
Benchmark fit

RILYG sensitivity to QQQ

The benchmark relationship is weak and explains 0% of weekly movement over the latest year. Current beta is -0.02 and is stable.

Likely beta range-0.32 to 0.28

A wider range means the beta estimate is less precise.

Beta stability48/100

How consistently rolling beta has held its level and direction.

Annualised alpha+29.3%

The weekly regression intercept annualised; it is historical, not expected return.

Tracking error27.0%

Annualised volatility of returns above or below the benchmark.

Relationship directionRelationship broadly stable

+0.2 point change in movement explained across two distinct 26-week windows.

Beta and benchmark fitBeta is secondary evidence only
Weaker benchmark fitStronger benchmark fitLower sensitivityHigher sensitivity

The benchmark fit is too weak for the headline beta to be treated as a dependable description on its own.

Historical one-week sensitivity
If QQQ rises 1%-0.56%historically associated RILYG move
If QQQ falls 1%+0.12%historically associated RILYG move
Likely beta range -0.32 to 0.28 ยท width 0.60
Can the beta be trusted?Weak relationship
Movement explained0%
Stability48%
Directional agreement63%

Rolling beta

26-week estimates show whether market sensitivity is rising or falling.

Move across the chart to inspect a completed week.
Rolling betaMarket-like beta 1.00

Rolling relationship strength

Correlation shows direction; explained movement shows how useful the relationship has been.

Move across the chart to inspect a completed week.
CorrelationMovement explained
PeriodBetaCorrelationMovement explainedAlphaExcess returnTracking error
6 months0.037%0%+15.6%-8.9%23.0%
1 year-0.02-2%0%+29.3%+5.8%27.0%
2 years0.4615%2%+48.6%+68.5%63.9%
3 years0.165%0%+33.9%-47.8%70.1%
Relative strength

RILYG relative strength against QQQ

The score compares the stock/benchmark ratio with its trailing 52-week average. Above zero means the ratio is above trend; direction shows whether that advantage is building or fading.

Relative-strength trend

Current score 2.62 ยท 13-week change -4.98

Move across the chart to inspect a completed week.
Relative strengthZero baseline

Stock, benchmark and worthwhile peers

Each path starts at 100. Sector and industry appear only when their Market Structure indexes have enough constituents.

Move across the chart to inspect a completed week.
Peer comparisonNot used

The stored sector and industry groups did not meet the minimum constituent thresholds for a worthwhile comparison.

Return components

13-week and 52-week returns relative to QQQ

This is a return bridge, not a claim of cause. It starts with the benchmark return, then shows the difference added at sector, industry and ticker level.

Last 13 weeks+1.5 points vs benchmark
Broad market-0.5%
Return beyond benchmark+1.5%

The largest source of relative strength was the return beyond benchmark. RILYG returned 1.0%; QQQ returned -0.5%.

Last 52 weeks+5.8 points vs benchmark
Broad market+25.2%
Return beyond benchmark+5.8%

The largest source of relative strength was the return beyond benchmark. RILYG returned 31.0%; QQQ returned 25.2%.

Market conditions

RILYG in rising and falling benchmark weeks

Downside beta is higher than upside beta, so weak benchmark weeks have carried more sensitivity.

Upside beta-0.5639% upside capture
Downside beta-0.12-8% downside capture
Current splitMore exposed in falling markets-0.44 beta gap
ConditionWeeksRILYG averageQQQ averageBetaBeat benchmark
Benchmark up29+0.88%+2.29%-0.5628%
Benchmark down23+0.14%-1.84%-0.1278%
Strongest benchmark weeks10+0.02%+4.05%0.110%
Weakest benchmark weeks10-0.05%-3.12%-0.5390%
Quieter benchmark weeks26+1.36%+0.23%0.2058%
Historical extremes

Strongest and weakest 13-week relative periods

Distinct 13-week windows prevent one long move from filling the list with overlapping dates.

Strongest relative periods

2025-05-16 to 2025-08-08+174.6 pts

RILYG 192.5% ยท QQQ 17.9%

The move was not clearly shared by the available sector or industry indexes.
2024-10-18 to 2025-01-10+38.3 pts

RILYG 41.2% ยท QQQ 3.0%

The move was not clearly shared by the available sector or industry indexes.
2025-12-05 to 2026-02-27+34.9 pts

RILYG 33.1% ยท QQQ -1.8%

The move was not clearly shared by the available sector or industry indexes.

Weakest relative periods

2024-05-24 to 2024-08-16-56.2 pts

RILYG -50.9% ยท QQQ 5.3%

The move was not clearly shared by the available sector or industry indexes.
2023-11-03 to 2024-01-26-47.2 pts

RILYG -24.1% ยท QQQ 23.0%

The move was not clearly shared by the available sector or industry indexes.
2023-01-06 to 2023-03-31-35.6 pts

RILYG -14.9% ยท QQQ 20.7%

The move was not clearly shared by the available sector or industry indexes.
Pressure and timing

Drawdowns and lead/lag relationship

The strongest link is in the same week. Lead/lag evidence is treated as secondary because timing relationships can change quickly.

Drawdown from each rolling high

Worst available drawdown: RILYG -65.7% ยท QQQ -34.1%

Move across the chart to inspect a completed week.
RILYG drawdownQQQ drawdown
Ticker leads 2w
-6%
Ticker leads 1w
-8%
Same week
5%
Benchmark leads 1w
1%
Benchmark leads 2w
-7%
Observable signals

Signals that would confirm or change the reading

These are conditions to monitor, not price targets or forecasts.

Relative strengthAbove the zero baseline

A fall through zero would show that the stock/benchmark ratio has moved below its trailing one-year average.

Up/down beta-0.44 upside-minus-downside gap

Downside beta is higher than upside beta. A narrowing gap would be the first sign of better asymmetry.

Exposure trendBeta is stable

Rising beta means broad-market moves are carrying more weight; falling beta means ticker-specific forces are carrying more weight.

Method and limits

Data and interpretation limits

Data
Completed weekly observations from 2021-12-17 to 2026-08-21 ยท 245 aligned weeks.
Current reading
52 weeks; rolling charts use 26 weeks.
Relative strength
Stock/benchmark ratio compared with its trailing 52-week average.
Peer evidence
At least 10 sector constituents and 5 industry constituents. Thin groups are excluded.
Boundary
Historical relationship analysis, not a forecast or a statement of cause. Historical relationships can break without warning.

Evidence context