VBNK beta and relative strength
VersaBank
VBNK is strengthening above benchmark with lower sensitivity to QQQ.
VBNK in rising and falling QQQ weeks
These percentages count what actually happened in completed weeks. They describe historical participation, not certainty about the next move.
Rising and falling benchmark weeks have both produced consistent directional participation.
65% of directional weeks moved the same way.VBNK also rose in 66% of 29 rising benchmark weeks.
VBNK also fell in 65% of 23 falling benchmark weeks.
After 42 earlier matches by market direction, directional participation is mixed.
VBNK sensitivity to QQQ
The benchmark relationship is weak and explains 4% of weekly movement over the latest year. Current beta is 0.43 and is stable.
A wider range means the beta estimate is less precise.
How consistently rolling beta has held its level and direction.
The weekly regression intercept annualised; it is historical, not expected return.
Annualised volatility of returns above or below the benchmark.
+7.3 point change in movement explained across two distinct 26-week windows.
The benchmark fit is too weak for the headline beta to be treated as a dependable description on its own.
Rolling beta
26-week estimates show whether market sensitivity is rising or falling.
Rolling relationship strength
Correlation shows direction; explained movement shows how useful the relationship has been.
VBNK relative strength against QQQ
The score compares the stock/benchmark ratio with its trailing 52-week average. Above zero means the ratio is above trend; direction shows whether that advantage is building or fading.
Relative-strength trend
Current score 13.88 ยท 13-week change +4.04
Stock, benchmark and worthwhile peers
Each path starts at 100. Sector and industry appear only when their Market Structure indexes have enough constituents.
versus sector over 13 weeks ยท 992 constituents ยท 39% correlation
versus industry over 13 weeks ยท 319 constituents ยท 47% correlation
15% of weekly movement explained by the sector over one year.
22% of weekly movement explained by the industry over one year.
13-week and 52-week returns relative to QQQ
This is a return bridge, not a claim of cause. It starts with the benchmark return, then shows the difference added at sector, industry and ticker level.
The largest source of relative strength was the sector difference. VBNK returned 12.0%; QQQ returned -0.5%.
The largest source of relative strength was the ticker difference. VBNK returned 82.0%; QQQ returned 25.2%.
VBNK in rising and falling benchmark weeks
Upside beta is higher than downside beta, a historically favourable split.
Strongest and weakest 13-week relative periods
Distinct 13-week windows prevent one long move from filling the list with overlapping dates.
Strongest relative periods
VBNK 44.5% ยท QQQ 3.3%
The return pattern shows that the industry added to the move, and the ticker moved beyond its peer backdrop.VBNK 37.5% ยท QQQ -0.2%
The return pattern shows that the sector moved the same way, and the industry added to the move, and the ticker moved beyond its peer backdrop.VBNK 52.8% ยท QQQ 15.8%
The return pattern shows that the ticker moved beyond its peer backdrop.Weakest relative periods
VBNK -41.5% ยท QQQ -6.4%
The return pattern shows that the industry added to the move, and the ticker moved beyond its peer backdrop.VBNK -27.2% ยท QQQ 0.9%
The return pattern shows that the sector moved the same way, and the ticker moved beyond its peer backdrop.VBNK -5.8% ยท QQQ 19.6%
The return pattern shows that the sector moved the same way, and the industry added to the move.Drawdowns and lead/lag relationship
The strongest link is in the same week. Lead/lag evidence is treated as secondary because timing relationships can change quickly.
Drawdown from each rolling high
Worst available drawdown: VBNK -50.0% ยท QQQ -35.1%
Signals that would confirm or change the reading
These are conditions to monitor, not price targets or forecasts.
A fall through zero would show that the stock/benchmark ratio has moved below its trailing one-year average.
Upside beta is higher than downside beta. The favourable split remains intact while that gap stays positive.
Rising beta means broad-market moves are carrying more weight; falling beta means ticker-specific forces are carrying more weight.
Strength shared by the peer group is broader; strength confined to the ticker is more company-specific and usually less stable.
Data and interpretation limits
- Data
- Completed weekly observations from 2021-09-03 to 2026-08-21 ยท 260 aligned weeks.
- Current reading
- 52 weeks; rolling charts use 26 weeks.
- Relative strength
- Stock/benchmark ratio compared with its trailing 52-week average.
- Peer evidence
- At least 10 sector constituents and 5 industry constituents. Thin groups are excluded.
- Boundary
- Historical relationship analysis, not a forecast or a statement of cause. Historical relationships can break without warning.