Ticker Options Intelligence

FKWL options intelligence

Franklin Wireless Corp options pressure, expected move, strike concentration, and Sharemaestro trend context.

Conviction 25 Market data through 12 Aug 2026 Checked 13 Aug 2026 13:44 · complete available chain

Options-market disagreement

Mixed pressure

FKWL currently carries mixed options pressure with a 25/100 conviction score. The nearest-chain expected move is 15.0%, with volume/open-interest participation at 0.00.

Primary read Mixed

Options-market disagreement

Expected move 15.0%

Wider near-term move priced

Activity / OI 0.00

Current volume is quieter versus prior open interest

Put-call -

Balanced tape

Trend fit 50

Options are not fully confirming trend

Weekly backdrop +0.4%

RS -48.2

Expected move 15.0%
Put-call volume -
Volume / OI -
Reference IV 0.96
Max pain 2.50
Underlying 2.29
Nearest expiry 21 Aug 2026
Contracts 24

Research Brief

FKWL has a mixed chain read with 25/100 evidence alignment.

The practical question is whether the underlying confirms the options concentration. The chain prices a reference range of 1.95–2.63; The largest call open-interest concentration is 2.50; the largest put concentration is 2.50. The most active strike by current volume is 2.50.

Priced range1.95–2.63
Call concentration2.50
Put concentration2.50
Max pain reference2.50
What would confirm it
  • A clear directional pressure reading develops and price begins to agree.
What would weaken it
  • Volatility falls and the chain remains directionally mixed.
  • Options and the weekly trend are not yet giving the same message.
  • Front-expiry volatility is rich, so the signal may be event-driven and vulnerable to volatility compression.

Priced Move

Where the chain says movement becomes exceptional

Size, not direction · through 21 Aug

Options imply 1.95 to 2.63. Max pain at 2.50 sits inside that range, 9.2% above spot.

Spot Max pain
1.952.29 ± 0.342.63
Confirmation level

A close beyond 2.63 or below 1.95 at the 21 Aug expiry would exceed the move currently priced by this chain.

Important limitation

The range is a pricing reference, not a forecast; volatility can reprice sharply after news or as expiry approaches.

Score Construction

Why conviction is 25/100

Evidence alignment, not probability

Pressure is 5/100 toward calls; conviction uses its strength, while the signal label carries its direction.

Directional pressure5 × 42%
+2.2

How strongly activity leans toward calls or puts.

Participation0 × 22%
+0.0

Volume relative to existing open interest and contract-level activity.

Trend agreement50 × 26%
+13.1

How closely the chain read agrees with the underlying trend backdrop.

Volatility96 × 10%
+9.6

The intensity of implied volatility and the priced move.

Reconstructed score25.0Matches stored calculation

Positioning by Strike

Where open interest and current activity concentrate

Full strike map

The largest call open-interest concentration is 2.50; the largest put concentration is 2.50. The most active strike by current volume is 2.50. Open-interest concentrations show where positions exist; they are not proven support, resistance or dealer exposure.

Put open interestStrikeCall open interest
0
2.509.2%
0
0
5.00118.3%
0
0
7.50227.5%
0
Nearest spot strike Max pain strikeBars show relative OI within this expiry

Gamma Profile by Strike

Positive gamma proxy

Reported Greeks · 86% coverage

Call-side gamma sensitivity outweighs the put-side proxy across the retained chain. The largest bars mark levels where delta-hedging sensitivity may be most concentrated.

Net profile+$105Delta change / 1% move
Positive peak2.50+$100
Negative peak-No negative strike
Nearest balance-Interpolated sign change
StrikeNegativePositiveNet / 1% move
2.509.2%
+$100
5.00118.3%
+$4
7.50227.5%
+$1
Positive call-side proxy Negative put-side proxyHighlighted row is nearest spot strike

Scenario proxy = gamma × open interest × 100 shares × spot² × 1%. Calls are positive and puts negative by convention. Missing Greeks use a Black-Scholes estimate from stored IV with zero rate and dividend assumptions. Open interest does not reveal who is long or short, so this is not observed dealer positioning or a forecast.

Volatility Curve

Front-loaded volatility

2.44× front/back

Near-term options are materially richer than later expirations, consistent with concentrated event or immediate-risk pricing.

0.96 21 Aug 9d
0.47 18 Sep 37d
0.44 16 Oct 65d
0.39 15 Jan 156d

Volatility by Strike

Smile incomplete

Nearest expiry, within 20% of spot

There is not enough comparable OTM call and put volatility to classify the smile.

3
Put IV Call IV

Historical Replay

How matured reads behaved through expiry

0 matured · 0 directional

Forward validation is building. The earliest eligible stored read expires 21 Aug 2026; its result will appear after the matched closing reference is stored.

Directional follow-through-
Moves contained by pricing-
Average expiry move-
Validation readiness
  • Auditable calculationoriginal version retained
  • Independent entryone read per market session
  • Point-in-time referencerequired at entry
  • Matched expiry closereported only after maturity

Eligible snapshots must have a dated market session, stored signal, and point-in-time market reference. Each observation uses one read per market session and the first stored weekly close on or immediately after expiry; its original calculation version is retained. It is an evidence audit, not an executable strategy or evidence of future performance.

Evidence Quality

High

A97/100
Retained chain100%
Implied volatility100%
Two-sided quotes100%
Open interest100%
Chain status
Complete available chain
Market date
12 Aug 2026
Calculation
v2.0
Contracts
24 / 24
  • No material coverage gap was detected in the retained chain.

Aggregate chain data supports concentration, participation and pricing analysis. It does not identify trade aggressor, opening versus closing activity, multi-leg intent or dealer inventory.

Options Intent Radar

Likely noise

25/100
Primary intent Likely noise

Visible options activity is too thin or mixed to support a strong intent classification.

Flow vs price divergence No clean flow/price divergence

The options read is mixed, so divergence is not strong enough to classify.

Why this matters

Likely noise matters because it connects the options headline to the actual evidence: $0 of estimated gross traded notional, no dominant cluster, and a no clean flow/price divergence backdrop. Use it as a research priority signal, then validate the chart, liquidity, event calendar, and risk before acting.

Options pressure+5
1W price+0.4%
Call premium0%
Put premium0%
Notional split C 0% / P 0% Estimated gross traded notional uses volume × contract multiplier × midpoint, or last price when no valid midpoint is available.
Freshness 0.00 Volume divided by open interest across the visible chain.
Trend fit 50/100 Agreement between options pressure and Sharemaestro market context.
Aggregate chain data does not identify trade aggressor or opening versus closing activity; call/put concentration is not proof of market direction.
Conviction clusters No dominant cluster

No high-conviction option cluster is visible in this snapshot.

Setup Classification

Opportunity and risk frame

Context, not advice
Warning Volatility expansion

The tape is pricing or displaying unusually elevated activity.

Warning Event-risk setup

Expected move or upcoming earnings makes the setup more event-sensitive.

Activity Anomaly

Normal range

63

Activity is broadly in line with recent stored snapshots.

Baseline: 10 completed sessions

Volume rank60th
Volume/OI rank60th
IV rank70th

Market Context

Underlying confirmation

Sharemaestro weekly
Close2.29
1W+0.4%
RS-48.2
Fair value-40.5%
Options pressure5
Speculation0
Volatility96
Trend fit50

Today Versus Normal

Stored-options context

View history
Expected move 15.0% muted
30d avg 25.0% · 10 sessions 0th
90d avg - · 10/30 sessions -
180d avg - · 10/60 sessions -
IV 0.96 near normal
30d avg 0.97 · 10 sessions 70th
90d avg - · 10/30 sessions -
180d avg - · 10/60 sessions -
Put-call - history building
30d avg - · 1/10 sessions -
90d avg - · 1/30 sessions -
180d avg - · 1/60 sessions -
Volume/OI 0.00 near normal
30d avg 0.05 · 10 sessions 60th
90d avg - · 10/30 sessions -
180d avg - · 10/60 sessions -

Pressure Trail

Recent pressure and volatility

Open trail
29 Jul 11:49 Mixed
Pressure 5
Move 16.1%
30 Jul 08:44 Mixed
Pressure 5
Move 16.1%
31 Jul 11:45 Volatility
Pressure -95
Move 16.5%
31 Jul 17:09 Mixed
Pressure 11
Move 83.3%
31 Jul 21:46 Mixed
Pressure 11
Move 85.1%
2 Aug 01:11 Mixed
Pressure 3
Move 16.8%
3 Aug 16:07 Mixed
Pressure 11
Move 85.7%
5 Aug 10:22 Volatility
Pressure -97
Move 16.9%

Strike Map

Where activity is clustering

Full strike map
Strike2.50
Calls · V 0 · OI 0
Puts · V 0 · OI 0
Strike5.00
Calls · V 0 · OI 0
Puts · V 0 · OI 0
Strike7.50
Calls · V 0 · OI 0
Puts · V 0 · OI 0

Term Structure

Expiration activity

Volume and IV
Expiry21 Aug 2026
Contracts6
Avg IV0.96
Put-call-
Expiry18 Sep 2026
Contracts6
Avg IV0.47
Put-call-
Expiry16 Oct 2026
Contracts6
Avg IV0.44
Put-call-
Expiry15 Jan 2027
Contracts6
Avg IV0.39
Put-call-

Skew

Call/put IV balance

OTM demand
21 Aug 2026Incomplete skew
Call IV0.20
Put IV-
Skew-
18 Sep 2026Incomplete skew
Call IV0.09
Put IV-
Skew-
16 Oct 2026Incomplete skew
Call IV0.83
Put IV-
Skew-
15 Jan 2027Incomplete skew
Call IV0.53
Put IV-
Skew-

Contract Tape

Most active contracts

Full contract tape
ContractFKWL270115C00002500
SideCall
Expiry15 Jan 2027
Strike2.50
Volume-
OI84
IV0.57
ContractFKWL270115P00002500
SidePut
Expiry15 Jan 2027
Strike2.50
Volume-
OI65
IV0.45
ContractFKWL261016C00002500
SideCall
Expiry16 Oct 2026
Strike2.50
Volume-
OI21
IV0.58
ContractFKWL270115C00005000
SideCall
Expiry15 Jan 2027
Strike5.00
Volume-
OI8
IV0.53
ContractFKWL261016C00007500
SideCall
Expiry16 Oct 2026
Strike7.50
Volume-
OI5
IV1.20
ContractFKWL270115P00005000
SidePut
Expiry15 Jan 2027
Strike5.00
Volume-
OI1
IV0.01
ContractFKWL260918C00002500
SideCall
Expiry18 Sep 2026
Strike2.50
Volume-
OI1
IV0.09
ContractFKWL260918C00005000
SideCall
Expiry18 Sep 2026
Strike5.00
Volume-
OI-
IV1.12

Evidence context