Pattern Intelligence · MEX

ARA quant read

The pattern is not clean enough for a strong directional call. The chart needs confirmation.

Open full chart Universe dashboard

Next week 40.1%

Unclear · avg analogue -0.12%

Low conviction

Next 4 weeks 59.9%

Unclear · avg analogue +2.13%

Low conviction

Live chart evidence Chart evidence supports the read

5 of the core evidence blocks are supportive.

Quant agreement Evidence not decisive

A decisive weekly close that pulls the 1-week and 4-week evidence into agreement.

Current weekly tape

Price, trend line, and fair value

Use this to anchor the probability read to the actual chart. A bearish analogue read is more serious when price is below trend or stretched above fair value.

Close: 4.85
Trend Line: 4.69
Fair value: 3.50

Hover chart for weekly context.

Practical insights

What this is saying

Pattern Lab compares today’s setup with resolved historical setups. The useful question is not “does it look similar?” but “when it looked similar before, did price actually go higher?”

Bias: wait for confirmation A decisive weekly close that pulls the 1-week and 4-week evidence into agreement.

Supportive

Price vs Trend Line: +3.32%
Price vs Fair Value: +38.66%
Relative Strength: +0.19
Market Activity: +0.18
Price Cycle: +0.39

Headwinds

No core headwind block is clearly negative.

Signal stack

What changed underneath price?

Each signal is standardized against its own recent history, so the lines show whether the current reading is unusually strong or weak for this stock.

Hover for standardized signal values.

Historical memory

Nearest 4-week analogue returns

Bars are the forward 4-week returns from the closest resolved examples, ordered by similarity. Red clustering is the warning sign.

Hover for analogue return and similarity rank.

Outcome frame

Range of outcomes from the nearest 4-week analogues

This is not a forecast range. It is the historical distribution of similar setups, translated into bear/base/bull context.

Bear case -3.53%

What weaker historical analogues tended to deliver.

Base analogue +0.87%

The middle outcome from the nearest resolved examples.

Bull case +4.60%

What stronger historical analogues tended to deliver.

Evidence stack

Why the model sees this setup

These are the current conditions feeding the analogue read. The point is not the number alone; it is whether the evidence agrees with the probability read.

Price vs Trend Line +3.32%

Price is close to trend, so direction still needs confirmation.

Price vs Fair Value +38.66%

Price is stretched above the current Fair Value estimate.

Market Dynamics -0.00

Market Dynamics are neutral.

Relative Strength +0.19

The stock is showing relative leadership.

Market Activity +0.18

This component is supportive.

Price Cycle +0.39

This component is supportive.

Historical rhymes

Closest resolved setups

The table keeps the model honest: these are the actual examples behind the headline odds.

Ticker	Week	Similarity	Outcome	4W return
FCMC PAR	2026-06-12	0.725	higher	+2.11%
RILYG NASDAQ	2026-06-12	0.7206	higher	+0.51%
BAIN PAR	2026-06-12	0.6989	flat	0.00%
9532 SAU	2026-06-12	0.6941	higher	+0.79%
ABEV3 SAO	2026-06-12	0.692	lower	-4.49%
YUASA SET	2026-06-12	0.6894	lower	-0.70%
A1DI34 SAO	2026-06-12	0.6888	lower	-3.62%
A1MT34 SAO	2026-06-12	0.685	higher	+7.64%
VUXEN STO	2026-06-12	0.6735	higher	+47.09%
RILYZ NASDAQ	2026-06-12	0.6732	lower	-5.00%
FIQE3 SAO	2026-06-12	0.669	lower	-3.28%
MSBI NASDAQ	2026-06-12	0.6684	higher	+1.23%

Distinctive drivers

What made this setup unusual

These are the largest deviations from the run baseline, renamed into plain market language.

Trend Signal 0.62853
Sector structure 0.59761
Volume pressure -0.46582
Close location 0.42663

This is historical analogue evidence, not advice. It becomes more useful when probability, average return, chart evidence, and nearby examples all point in the same direction.