Pattern Intelligence ยท SHZ

000011 quant read

The nearest historical setups lean lower, but the live chart evidence is not confirming that read yet.

Next week 20.0%

Likely lower ยท avg analogue -1.77%

Moderate conviction
Next 4 weeks 34.2%

Likely lower ยท avg analogue -1.93%

Moderate conviction
Live chart evidence Chart evidence supports the read

2 of the core evidence blocks are supportive.

Quant agreement Probabilities agree

Not confirmed yet; needs price losing trend support before treating the downside read as live.

Current weekly tape

Price, trend line, and fair value

Use this to anchor the probability read to the actual chart. A bearish analogue read is more serious when price is below trend or stretched above fair value.

Close
8.50
Trend Line
8.00
Fair value
8.59
Hover chart for weekly context.

Signal stack

What changed underneath price?

Each signal is standardized against its own recent history, so the lines show whether the current reading is unusually strong or weak for this stock.

Hover for standardized signal values.

Historical memory

Nearest 4-week analogue returns

Bars are the forward 4-week returns from the closest resolved examples, ordered by similarity. Red clustering is the warning sign.

Hover for analogue return and similarity rank.
Outcome frame

Range of outcomes from the nearest 4-week analogues

This is not a forecast range. It is the historical distribution of similar setups, translated into bear/base/bull context.

Bear case -3.69%

What weaker historical analogues tended to deliver.

Base analogue +0.17%

The middle outcome from the nearest resolved examples.

Bull case +3.99%

What stronger historical analogues tended to deliver.

Evidence stack

Why the model sees this setup

These are the current conditions feeding the analogue read. The point is not the number alone; it is whether the evidence agrees with the probability read.

Price vs Trend Line +6.20%

Price is comfortably above its medium-term trend.

Price vs Fair Value -1.10%

Price is close to Fair Value.

Market Dynamics +0.01

Market Dynamics are neutral.

Relative Strength +0.02

Relative strength is not giving a clear edge.

Market Activity +0.61

This component is supportive.

Price Cycle -0.01

This component is neutral.

Historical rhymes

Closest resolved setups

The table keeps the model honest: these are the actual examples behind the headline odds.

Ticker Week Similarity Outcome 4W return
600155
SHH
2026-06-12 0.7375 lower -0.56%
A1TH34
SAO
2026-06-12 0.7348 higher +35.36%
002252
SHZ
2026-06-12 0.7227 lower -7.93%
601136
SHH
2026-06-12 0.7213 higher +0.50%
601788
SHH
2026-06-12 0.7175 higher +4.83%
601236
SHH
2026-06-12 0.7162 higher +1.47%
600061
SHH
2026-06-12 0.7137 higher +3.06%
002481
SHZ
2026-06-12 0.7135 lower -1.96%
W1BO34
SAO
2026-06-12 0.7125 higher +1.03%
000750
SHZ
2026-06-12 0.7077 higher +4.74%
600918
SHH
2026-06-12 0.7062 lower -0.75%
002423
SHZ
2026-06-12 0.7053 higher +0.34%
Distinctive drivers

What made this setup unusual

These are the largest deviations from the run baseline, renamed into plain market language.

  • Sector structure 0.59734
  • Market Activity -0.58662
  • Trend Signal -0.37143
  • Price Cycle -0.32281
This is historical analogue evidence, not advice. It becomes more useful when probability, average return, chart evidence, and nearby examples all point in the same direction.

Evidence context