Pattern Intelligence · AMS

FFARM quant read

The nearest historical setups lean higher, but the live chart evidence is not confirming that read yet.

Open full chart Universe dashboard

Next week 63.6%

Likely higher · avg analogue +1.18%

Moderate conviction

Next 4 weeks 70.2%

Likely higher · avg analogue +3.32%

High conviction

Live chart evidence Chart evidence is mixed

The current setup has both supportive and challenging components.

Quant agreement Probabilities agree

Watch for price and relative strength to firm up before treating the upside read as confirmed.

Current weekly tape

Price, trend line, and fair value

Use this to anchor the probability read to the actual chart. A bearish analogue read is more serious when price is below trend or stretched above fair value.

Close: 5.91
Trend Line: 6.07
Fair value: 3.67

Hover chart for weekly context.

Practical insights

What this is saying

Pattern Lab compares today’s setup with resolved historical setups. The useful question is not “does it look similar?” but “when it looked similar before, did price actually go higher?”

Bias: upside potential, wait for confirmation Watch for price and relative strength to firm up before treating the upside read as confirmed.

Supportive

Price vs Fair Value: +60.94%
Price Cycle: +0.61

Headwinds

Market Activity: -0.06

Signal stack

What changed underneath price?

Each signal is standardized against its own recent history, so the lines show whether the current reading is unusually strong or weak for this stock.

Hover for standardized signal values.

Historical memory

Nearest 4-week analogue returns

Bars are the forward 4-week returns from the closest resolved examples, ordered by similarity. Red clustering is the warning sign.

Hover for analogue return and similarity rank.

Outcome frame

Range of outcomes from the nearest 4-week analogues

This is not a forecast range. It is the historical distribution of similar setups, translated into bear/base/bull context.

Bear case -0.78%

What weaker historical analogues tended to deliver.

Base analogue +4.32%

The middle outcome from the nearest resolved examples.

Bull case +7.80%

What stronger historical analogues tended to deliver.

Evidence stack

Why the model sees this setup

These are the current conditions feeding the analogue read. The point is not the number alone; it is whether the evidence agrees with the probability read.

Price vs Trend Line -2.71%

Price is close to trend, so direction still needs confirmation.

Price vs Fair Value +60.94%

Price is stretched above the current Fair Value estimate.

Market Dynamics -0.01

Market Dynamics are neutral.

Relative Strength +0.01

Relative strength is not giving a clear edge.

Market Activity -0.06

This component is a drag.

Price Cycle +0.61

This component is supportive.

Historical rhymes

Closest resolved setups

The table keeps the model honest: these are the actual examples behind the headline odds.

Ticker	Week	Similarity	Outcome	4W return
SKJE CPH	2026-06-05	0.8384	higher	+9.70%
8345 JPX	2026-06-05	0.8187	higher	+13.32%
DJUR CPH	2026-06-05	0.8137	higher	+10.45%
MNBA CPH	2026-06-05	0.8101	lower	-1.04%
BMGB4 SAO	2026-06-05	0.8099	higher	+7.60%
G0I SES	2026-05-29	0.8079	flat	0.00%
8524 JPX	2026-06-05	0.8063	higher	+15.73%
8338 JPX	2026-06-05	0.8028	higher	+4.65%
BMGB4 SAO	2026-05-29	0.8008	higher	+5.37%
8393 JPX	2026-06-05	0.7941	higher	+14.36%
5711 JPX	2026-06-05	0.7939	lower	-7.12%
8399 JPX	2026-06-05	0.7936	higher	+7.72%

Distinctive drivers

What made this setup unusual

These are the largest deviations from the run baseline, renamed into plain market language.

Sector structure 1.91166
Trend Signal 0.6239
Price vs Fair Value 0.62087
Price Cycle 0.60294

This is historical analogue evidence, not advice. It becomes more useful when probability, average return, chart evidence, and nearby examples all point in the same direction.