Pattern Intelligence · STO

ACROUD quant read

The pattern is not clean enough for a strong directional call. The chart needs confirmation.

Open full chart Universe dashboard

Next week 53.2%

Unclear · avg analogue +0.75%

Low conviction

Next 4 weeks 54.7%

Unclear · avg analogue +9.68%

Low conviction

Live chart evidence Chart evidence challenges the read

3 of the core evidence blocks are acting as headwinds.

Quant agreement Evidence not decisive

A decisive weekly close that pulls the 1-week and 4-week evidence into agreement.

Current weekly tape

Price, trend line, and fair value

Use this to anchor the probability read to the actual chart. A bearish analogue read is more serious when price is below trend or stretched above fair value.

Close: 0.14
Trend Line: 0.14
Fair value: 0.52

Hover chart for weekly context.

Practical insights

What this is saying

Pattern Lab compares today’s setup with resolved historical setups. The useful question is not “does it look similar?” but “when it looked similar before, did price actually go higher?”

Bias: wait for confirmation A decisive weekly close that pulls the 1-week and 4-week evidence into agreement.

Supportive

No core support block is clearly positive.

Headwinds

Price vs Fair Value: -73.60%
Relative Strength: -0.11
Price Cycle: -0.74

Signal stack

What changed underneath price?

Each signal is standardized against its own recent history, so the lines show whether the current reading is unusually strong or weak for this stock.

Hover for standardized signal values.

Historical memory

Nearest 4-week analogue returns

Bars are the forward 4-week returns from the closest resolved examples, ordered by similarity. Red clustering is the warning sign.

Hover for analogue return and similarity rank.

Outcome frame

Range of outcomes from the nearest 4-week analogues

This is not a forecast range. It is the historical distribution of similar setups, translated into bear/base/bull context.

Bear case -3.43%

What weaker historical analogues tended to deliver.

Base analogue -0.42%

The middle outcome from the nearest resolved examples.

Bull case +7.26%

What stronger historical analogues tended to deliver.

Evidence stack

Why the model sees this setup

These are the current conditions feeding the analogue read. The point is not the number alone; it is whether the evidence agrees with the probability read.

Price vs Trend Line -2.19%

Price is close to trend, so direction still needs confirmation.

Price vs Fair Value -73.60%

Price is trading below Fair Value, which can create recovery potential if pressure improves.

Market Dynamics -0.00

Market Dynamics are neutral.

Relative Strength -0.11

The stock is lagging relative strength.

Market Activity +0.01

This component is neutral.

Price Cycle -0.74

This component is a drag.

Historical rhymes

Closest resolved setups

The table keeps the model honest: these are the actual examples behind the headline odds.

Ticker	Week	Similarity	Outcome	4W return
FOOD TOR	2024-06-28	0.7014	higher	+1.75%
OUST NASDAQ	2024-01-26	0.693	lower	-3.24%
ESPA3 SAO	2024-09-27	0.6911	lower	-10.48%
GURU TOR	2024-03-01	0.6825	lower	-2.11%
ZM NASDAQ	2023-09-01	0.6818	lower	-2.48%
CLYM NASDAQ	2024-02-09	0.6768	higher	+2.25%
B1NT34 SAO	2024-07-05	0.6741	higher	+6.91%
EM2 ASX	2024-05-17	0.6727	lower	-29.27%
7172 KLS	2026-03-20	0.6689	higher	+48.03%
0336 HKG	2024-02-02	0.6683	higher	+9.22%
011090 KSC	2024-07-26	0.6658	lower	-3.57%
NYE MCE	2022-11-18	0.6656	lower	-6.00%

Distinctive drivers

What made this setup unusual

These are the largest deviations from the run baseline, renamed into plain market language.

Price Cycle -0.83361
Price vs Fair Value -0.8271
Trend Signal 0.57698
Sector structure -0.54749

This is historical analogue evidence, not advice. It becomes more useful when probability, average return, chart evidence, and nearby examples all point in the same direction.