Real Estate ยท Reit - Healthcare Facilities ยท Completed evidence

OHI relative to WELL

Omega Healthcare Investors Inc is the relatively depressed leg. Welltower Inc is the relatively extended leg.

Weekly separation -0.98ฯƒpercentile rank 17
Daily timing Gap extending-2.48ฯƒ latest
Relationship quality 73/100156 completed weeks
Evidence alignment 33/100depressed leg versus extended leg
Stability 73/10019 mean crossings
Break risk 30/100lower is more dependable
Specific pair strategy

What is the play in OHI / WELL?

This is a relative trade. The result depends on which security performs better, not on whether the whole market rises or falls.

Watchlist pair - not triggered

Possible future structure: long OHI / short WELL

The proposed pair would look for OHI to outperform WELL, but the current evidence does not yet justify treating the gap as a convergence trade.

Potential long leg Long OHI Omega Healthcare Investors Inc

This is the relatively depressed leg. The case needs it to recover or at least hold up better than the other leg.

Potential short leg Short WELL Welltower Inc

This is the relatively extended leg. The case needs it to lag or weaken relative to the long leg.

How the pair can make money

A favourable relative move means OHI rises more than WELL, falls less than WELL, or rises while WELL falls. If WELL outperforms OHI, the pair moves against the case.

What triggers it

Wait for a completed daily turn toward normal and fresh evidence that OHI is improving relative to WELL. The size of the gap alone is not the trigger.

What keeps it valid

If the daily gap keeps widening, leave the pair alone rather than averaging into the separation.

What cancels the case

Do not use the pair if the completed gap keeps widening, OHI continues to weaken relative to WELL, or the relationship moves into a break state.

What would confirm the research case?

The cleaner confirmation is a narrowing spread led by weakness in the extended leg rather than strength in both securities.

Evidence now

  • WELL Market Dynamics is weakening.

What would invalidate it?

A fresh strengthening in the extended leg can prolong the separation and increase short-side risk.

Possible setup paths

How the relative-value idea could be expressed

These are research structures, not recommendations or position-size instructions. The current course above determines whether any structure is ready to study now.

Two-leg convergence structure

Long OHI / short WELL

Treat both legs as one relative position. The setup looks for OHI to outperform WELL; OHI can rise faster, fall less, or rise while WELL falls. The pair loses ground when WELL outperforms OHI.

When it becomes relevantThis is a structure to study only after the current course changes from โ€œWait for the daily turnโ€ to confirmed convergence. The clearest next checkpoint is a sustained turn from a stable or extending daily gap to a narrowing one.Principal riskRequires a live review of both legs, borrow availability and cost, event dates, liquidity and the research normalisation.
Depressed-leg recovery study

Study OHI alone if its own evidence confirms

This simpler expression focuses on recovery in OHI. It avoids short-borrow mechanics, but it no longer isolates relative value: the result is exposed to the broad market, the sector and OHI-specific news.

When it becomes relevantA stronger case needs improving OHI price structure and supporting evidence, not just a wide relationship gap.Principal riskCarries full single-security and broad-market direction risk.
Extended-leg rollover study

Study WELL alone if its support continues to weaken

This expression focuses on weakness in WELL. It may fit a leader-rollover case, but it also abandons the relative hedge and adds direct market direction, squeeze and company-event risk.

When it becomes relevantWeakening in WELL must be visible in its own completed evidence; relative extension alone is not enough.Principal riskShort selling can involve unlimited loss, borrow fees, recalls and forced close-outs.

Any practical expression needs an independent review of suitability, portfolio risk, liquidity, current news and earnings, borrow availability and cost, transaction costs and tax.

Relationship gap ยท technical name: standardised residual

How far apart are they compared with normal?

Zero is the pair's historical centre. The outer guides show increasingly unusual departures from it.

What this chart is

This is the relationship gap after allowing for the pair's usual co-movement. Zero is its historical centre; the distance is measured in standard deviations, so different pairs can be compared on the same scale.

What it says now

The latest gap is 0.98 standard deviations from normal. OHI is the relatively depressed leg and WELL is the relatively extended leg. That is unusual separation, not proof that either security is cheap or expensive.

What matters next

A move toward zero means convergence. A move farther from zero means the separation is extending and raises the risk that the old relationship is changing.

Historical standardised relationship residualThe line shows how far the relationship sat above or below its fitted centre over completed weekly observations.
Common-base price paths

Which security created the gap?

Both paths begin at 100 so their relative movement is visible without mixing different share prices.

What this chart is

Both securities are reset to 100 at the first date. This removes the distraction of different share prices and shows how their completed weekly price paths diverged. It is not a valuation chart.

What it says now

Since the common starting point, OHI is +73.8% and WELL is +205.8%. The chart shows which price path contributed to the separation; the fitted relationship measure is more precise than the raw visual distance.

What matters next

For convergence, watch for OHI to catch up, WELL to lose ground, or both. The relationship can close even if both securities rise or both fall.

Indexed completed weekly price pathsIndexed paths for both securities in the relationship, beginning at 100.
OHIWELL
Completed daily timing

Is the gap closing yet?

The daily relationship adds timing context inside the slower weekly case. It does not replace the weekly validity checks.

What this chart is

This applies the same relationship to completed daily bars. It is the timing layer inside the weekly case, not a separate trading signal.

What it says now

Gap extending: The completed daily gap is still widening. The weekly separation may be interesting, but timing has not confirmed a turn.

What matters next

The first useful change would be for the daily line to stop extending and begin moving back toward zero.

Completed daily standardised relationship residualThe daily path shows whether the current separation has narrowed or extended across the latest completed sessions.
Relatively depressed leg

OHI ยท Omega Healthcare Investors Inc

57/100 evidence score
Market Dynamics
-0.002 ยท change -0.424
Trend
Positive
Stage
Stage 3 ยท Distribution
Smart Money
Neutral
News sentiment
Neutral
Options
Bullish
Open OHI research terminal โ†’
Relatively extended leg

WELL ยท Welltower Inc

91/100 evidence score
Market Dynamics
0.568 ยท change -0.691
Trend
Positive
Stage
Stage 2 ยท Advancing
Smart Money
Neutral
Short interest
Neutral
Options
Bullish
Open WELL research terminal โ†’
Relationship diagnostics

Why this pair is on the map

Return co-movement0.57

How closely completed weekly returns moved together across the measurement window.

Residual stability73/100

How consistent the fitted relationship remained across earlier and later parts of the sample.

Typical decay7.8 weeks

An observed mean-reversion clock, not a deadline or a forecast.

Mean crossings19

How often the residual crossed its historical centre; repeated crossings matter more than a single fit.

Spread percentile17th

The latest residual's location inside its own completed history.

Tradability context87/100

Stored price, volume and size context only. It does not include a live short locate or cost.

Held-out resolution 100%

1 of 1 non-overlapping historical separations resolved after the relationship was fitted on earlier data.

Typical resolution14.0 weeks

Median time to return near the earlier fitted centre among the held-out cases that resolved.

Worst extension+0.00ฯƒ

The largest further move recorded after a measured held-out separation, before resolution or the observation window ended.

State history

What changed and when

Daily timing changed

Completed daily timing changed to gap extending through 2026-08-21.

Research state changed

Changed from Two-sided convergence to Leader rollover.

Daily timing changed

Completed daily timing changed to gap extending through 2026-08-21.

Daily timing changed

Completed daily timing changed to gap narrowing through 2026-08-19.

Daily timing changed

Completed daily timing changed to gap extending through 2026-08-17.

Relationship discovered

Published as Two-sided convergence after the completed 2026-08-14 observation.

Same-industry map
Measure guide

Weekly separation

How far the latest completed weekly relationship sits from its own historical centre.

A larger reading means the two securities are unusually far apart relative to this relationship's completed history. It identifies a dislocation; it does not, by itself, predict convergence.

Measure guide

Daily timing

The direction of the gap across the latest completed daily sessions.

Narrowing means the daily gap has begun to close, extending means it has widened, and stable means the change is not yet material. The weekly relationship remains the primary research clock.

Measure guide

Relationship quality

A public summary of how dependable the completed historical relationship has been.

It brings together repeatability, stability and later-sample behaviour. Higher is stronger, but no score guarantees that a historical relationship will continue.

Measure guide

Evidence alignment

Whether the wider stored evidence supports the depressed leg relative to the extended leg.

The comparison uses published price structure and supporting research for both securities. Higher alignment means more of that evidence points in the same relative direction; construction weights are not disclosed.

Measure guide

Stability

How consistently the relationship held across earlier and later completed observations.

Higher stability means the relationship changed less across the sample. It is a durability check, not a forecast or a guarantee of mean reversion.

Measure guide

Break risk

The risk that the earlier relationship is no longer a dependable reference point.

Lower is better. A high reading warns that the separation may reflect new information or a structural change rather than a temporary gap.

Measure guide

Research normalisation

A common scale used to compare the two historical price paths.

It describes the fitted relationship for research. It is not a position size, hedge instruction or risk target, and it excludes live borrow, fees, slippage and portfolio constraints.

Measure guide

Held-out resolution

How often earlier measured separations later moved back near their fitted centre.

Each historical check is fitted only on information that came before it. The result is descriptive evidence from this relationship's history, not an expected return or future probability.

Evidence context